Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cobranet/archive1

Cobranet
Self-Nomination: This article has attained GA status and had a peer review. I am essentially the sole contributor to the article. The GA review and peer review didn't turn up any major issues with the article. Let me know if there are any ways to further improve from here. Thanks. Snottywong 12:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Object and Refer to peer review. The article was listed at peer review on May 4th, and removed on May 7th after one brief comment.  Suggest review of WP:MSH as a starting place.  The article has external jumps, and is largely uncited.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 12:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Object - As Sandy said, undercited and does not comply with Manual of Style (headings). Parts of this article are very listy and should be converted into prose. Non-free images lack sufficient article-specific fair use rationale per Non-free content. I'm not sure the collapsible tables with lists of external jumps are the way to go.  Pagra shtak  14:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)