Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Codex Carolinus/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 18:47, 11 December 2010.

Codex Carolinus

 * Nominator(s): Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because it is complete. All available sources were used. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - This appears unprepared, especially with regard to the quality of writing. It needs a thorough copyedit at the very least, to bring it up to a professional standard of writing—it contains basic grammatical errors. -- Andy Walsh  (talk)  01:26, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Leszek, you will always need a native speaker to give your stuff a good copyedit before sending it to FA. In addition the context of the MS and the meaning of the technical terms used would need a fair amount of expansion for FA. Johnbod (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.