Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Crucifixion/archive1

Crucifixion
''Note: contents duplicated from to create this page, in order to enable proper linking via ArticleHistory at the target article. Maralia (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC)''

This article is very well written, with easy to understand and smoothly-reading prose. It is fairly stable, neutral enough for a topic that could have provided a good deal of controversy, and very informative. I'll be interested to see what everyone else thinks... --Wolf530 18:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Neutralitytalk 18:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Reason(s) for opposition? - Vedexent 19:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The article relies heavily on the 1911 Britannica. There are no citations. Neutralitytalk 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * thanks (unsigned comment by 222.154.151.123)
 * As a note, this is not appearing on the Featured article candidates page. I'm not sure how to rememdy this... --Wolf530 09:10, 30 March 2006 (UTC)