Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/David Berman (musician)/archive1

David Berman (musician)

 * Nominator(s): DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

He wrote sad songs and got paid by the tear. They’re motel masterpieces about dream attacks and beer drinking robots. His mother named him after a king and he was the son of “possibly the most evil man in America”. In 2003, he was hospitalised for approaching death; shined out in the wild kindness; and left this world behind on the back of a black camel. Here's hoping he gets that Pulitzer for the "frontline series 'Iowa Jima' published in the 2022 A.D. Pittsburgh Daily Humanoid," his words. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Image licensing looks ok. I'm not sure about the non-free media and will let someone else evaluate that (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments from blz 2049
Hi DMT! Having skimmed the article as a whole and explored a few crannies in detail, I'm already hugely impressed by the scope, depth, sophistication, and sensitivity of the article, which is immensely deserved for a subject like Berman. I've already started with some direct edits to the article; please let me know if there are any issues with these edits. I have three initial, intertwined, article-wide comments:
 * Lots of long sentences here—there are semicolons and em dashes galore; I even found a sentence that had both a semicolon and an em dash. I'd advise curbing these wherever possible in favor of more bite-size sentences.
 * Implementation of the Harvard-style citations with sfn and sfnm looks OK throughout, but the cites are often bundled together in ways that make it difficult to quickly ascertain which source(s) contributed which bit(s) of info within a given sentence. This can be particularly unclear when a footnote attached to a direct quote provides a range of sources. For example, in the "Poetry" section, nine sources are cited within a single footnote for a list of eight distinct qualities critics have found in both Berman's poetry and his lyrics. But are all nine sources in unanimous agreement about all eight items...? There should be eight footnotes here splitting out exactly who said what.
 * In the case of some complicated-yet-necessary multi-source footnotes, I'd also recommend using the nps parameter to provide a brief snippet quote indicating what exact language is backing up what portion of a particular claim and how. This is especially useful when each source supports a certain phrase of a sentence but not the rest, or where sources say the same thing in a different way that may be worth clarifying to avoid confusion or disagreement. For instance, if one critic describes Berman's poetry as "direct" while another said "blunt", both words would reasonably support a claim that critics have found a quality of "directness" in his poetry, but without a parenthetical quote in the cite a reader may find it slightly more tedious to try to pinpoint where the second critic's article says anything about the poetry being "direct" at all (⌘-F would be no help).Here's an example from one of my articles to show you what I mean; each of the three sources provided some of the information I needed, but each was missing necessary components, too, and I wanted to clarify for future reference (and my own future sanity). Plus here's a second example that's more quotation-heavy. Plus plus, here's some example code for you to try (the weird manual HTML space thing &#32; seems necessary to force the first "ps" space, fwiw):

These two comments are intertwined in the sense that breaking up long sentences should also generally make it easier to use more precise citation. More clarity in citations also makes it easier to later revise/split/combine sentences. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 13:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you for these comments and the relevant examples. They're the type of in-depth assessment befit for here. I intend to fulfil them but should perhaps explain their predication. The article is somewhat of a chimera; despite his acclaim and pithy prose, Berman has received little academic - or otherwise in-depth - attention. To be properly comprehensive I've essentially had to glue together ephemera.


 * With regards to the long sentences, that's more a matter of personal viewpoint. My, admittedly idiosyncratic, style favours citations to be as intrusive as possible; invisible, if I had my way. Previously there were sequences of 8 plus citations. It was far from great. But I very much see the value in your suggestions. DMT Biscuit (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I believe I have done all the relevant copyediting. If there' other areas you wish to flag up feel free to say. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

I gotchu—I'm 100% on the same page that minimal footnotes with Harvard-style citations is vastly preferable to stacking a mess of footnotes like "[84][1][7][75][76][63][33][39][3]". Like you, I've written on some (relatively) obscure subjects that required creative stitching among sources when no single source standing alone quite gets to some big essential obvious point, so I understand the practical difficulties you're working within (and, I have to say, you've done a phenomenal job aggregating the extant source material and assembling it into a meaningful overall package). I should also maybe clarify for the record that, from what I've seen so far, my issue was not so much about any improper synthesis, but about the much smaller issue of the convenience of verification—not even capital-V Verifiability as such, more so clarity and the ease for a reviewer/reader while navigating the text and sources—plus my own personal sense of how to enhance the utility of citations in some cases. This is mainly important for direct quotes if attribution is not made clear by the text itself, but beyond that it becomes more a matter of personal preference. The revisions you've made on this front look excellent and are pretty much exactly what I had in mind, btw, so kudos for that.

I also am not feeling too harshly about the long sentence thing, fwiw. I myself am addicted to semicolons, em dashes, even parenthetical remarks (see, for instance, this comment). If anything, my advice there reflects my long-term observation that others have improved on my sentences by chopping them down to size. 's influence has probably improved my writing technique more than that of any English teacher from high school onward, so shouts out.

I came across two potentially interesting sources; you may have already come across yourself, but I figured I would highlight them just in case given the relative dearth of material. I haven't read through these in any great detail yet, but I figure you'd have the better perspective on what can be gleaned from these. If nothing else, these might make sense as entries in a "Further reading" section.
 * This literary journal is extinct but it can be found cited in academic bibliographies, so it's legit. Might be a worthwhile "Further reading" if nothing else, though I bet there'll be some decent insight and/or info in there. Shouts out to Kathleen for providing the scan.
 * This literary journal is extinct but it can be found cited in academic bibliographies, so it's legit. Might be a worthwhile "Further reading" if nothing else, though I bet there'll be some decent insight and/or info in there. Shouts out to Kathleen for providing the scan.


 * Another extinct and obscure journal, but at least one serious literary academic bibliography recognizes it so I say it's legit. The author even provided their unabridged interview transcript; haven't read that either, but it's not impossible there's some worthy nugget of info that got cut from the full article.
 * Another extinct and obscure journal, but at least one serious literary academic bibliography recognizes it so I say it's legit. The author even provided their unabridged interview transcript; haven't read that either, but it's not impossible there's some worthy nugget of info that got cut from the full article.


 * Thanks for finding these sources, they certainly eluded me. The first, as you said, seems reputable enough and I have cited; feel free to inspect such additions. It's worth mentioning that Kathleen Rooney even has her own article. Is she Harold Bloom? No, but she's got some credentials. I'd recommend a read. Trademark humour from Berman and some sadly prescient material.


 * The second one fares less well. The bibliography you linked returns to the above article; so, it is a scattered interview banished to obscurity written by a then-student. Best not. Thanks, all the same. How did you even find these? Skilled sleuthing. DMT Biscuit (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Whoops, I goofed on that bibliographic link; fixed now. Even so, if that second source isn't useful that's fine. Honestly nice that one of those panned out. Wish I could retrace my steps and explain how I find things like that beyond saying I enter a meditative fugue state and commune directly with the Internet Archive itself. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 11:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Funny, you'd mention the archive; found a nice profile there by Plan B. The founder, and writer of the relevant article, Everett True, has some respectable credentials, in my opinion. Free to inspect my additions. DMT Biscuit (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

More comments:
 * As I noted in an edit summary, it'd be a good idea to unpack Robert Bingham's connection to Berman in more tangible terms, particularly his role as Berman's publisher (and indeed, as a person who evidently established a company to publish Berman's poetry). Right now it's not clear why Bingham's death should be singled out, but it easily could be. Their friendship and working relationship would be worth highlighting regardless of whether Bingham had died.
 * I added a sentence about Bingham being the founder of Open City. If you think there could be more, just say.


 * This is a minor point, but be sure whenever you have square brackets next to quotation marks to use nowrap like so: "[e]xample quote phrase". This keeps the quotation mark glued to the bracket, otherwise they split at the end of a line of text, resulting in an awkward dangling quotation mark. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 02:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep, done all these. DMT Biscuit (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Berman's discography entails not merely his contributions to Silver Jews and Purple Mountains, but also (as you note throughout the article) several noteworthy guest appearances/production credits/etc. AllMusic provides a decent place to start here, though again many (if not all?) of his notable credits are already mentioned throughout the article body. These miscellaneous credits aren't so extensive that they necessitate an entire separate "David Berman discography" article, but since there is no separate article there probably should be some more detailed listing of his "solo" (i.e. non-SJ, non-PM) recording credits in the discography section.
 * Hi . I don't necessarily object to this addition but I am somewhat unsure of how to approach it. The allmusic list is dubious, given it goes as far back as 1979 with no distinction. Should I just list the credits already mentioned? DMT Biscuit (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Lots of responsive and new comments; I've broken it into sections to make it all easier to process, lol. Apologies for the extreme infodump.

I'm thinking it could look something like David Bowie discography § Guest appearances, which handles credits both for individual tracks and across entire albums within a single table in a coherent way. I'd probably title it "Other contributions" though as it encompasses both "guest appearances" along with production & songwriting. It should be strictly Berman-only—non-SJs, non-PMs. As far as what to include/exclude, I've included some notes below, including comments on what potential additions to the article body text based on what I found:
 * I'd say anything already mentioned in the article body should be included there, like his production credit for Yonatan Gat's Universalists. (Incidentally, I was really pleased to learn from your article that Berman produced a whole album for Gat, who I saw perform once or twice around 2016–17. I knew little about him but he and his band are an exceptional live act; "Escorpião" is so thrilling.)
 * His two tracks with the Avalanches (both noted in the Wildflower article) should be there, and would probably be worth noting in the article body. A few details that stand out and make this feel noteworthy: the collab happened during his "hiatus"; "Avalances × Berman" strikes me at first blush like an unlikely (albeit welcome) collaboration; and based on the Wildflower article, at least one of the tracks features Berman reading from his poetry, which seems like an interesting overlap between his lives as literary figure and recording artist. Also, per Bomb, Jennifer Herrema of Royal Trux was the connect between Avalanches and DCB.
 * Will Oldham/Bonnie "P." Billy: This was surprisingly difficult to pin down, but per this Domino Records press release (or the album's track-by-track credits, as relayed secondhand by Discogs), Berman had two credits on Sings Greatest Palace Music: as a "vocal coach" on the recording of "New Partner", and as a backing vocalist on "No More Workhorse Blues"; tantalizingly, Domino notes the latter (first recorded for 1994's Days in the Wake) is a "song inspired by Berman", though I didn't find much else about this. The rerecording of the latter song with Berman's vocals was also issued as a single, the credits for which are on AllMusic, and fwiw it charted at #12 on the UK Independent Singles Chart (source: ).
 * Berman and Oldham issued a novelty 7-inch record called "Sea Note Presents Mr. Jews...The Search for the Elusive Silver Palace Record". I don't find it worth including, as it's not even clear Berman (or Oldham) had any direct involvement in its creation: their music is sampled to provide goofy answers to a goofy faux interview.
 * Vocals on "Can You Whoop It" from The Dexateens' album Singlewide (2009), per Nashville Scene (the credit is also evident via AllMusic, tho they were not specific as to the track).
 * OK to omit his "liner notes" for My Morning Jacket's Acoustic Citsuoca EP (2004), which appear to be just a quote. Besides, doesn't seem like Berman cared much for My Morning Jacket.

I think the discography subsection can and should include Berman's original lyrical/co-songwriting contributions to other artists. These are distinct from other artists covering songs credited as written Berman, which shows up a few times in the AllMusic discography. This also does not count times when Berman gets a songwriting credit because an artist quotes or uses Berman's old lines, as happened on the Avalanches' We Will Always Love You; you could include those credits if you'd like, but they don't seem as essential. Rather, what I'm referring to here are times when Berman, whether formally credited or not, contributed new lines to another artists's song.
 * Royal Trux – "Granny Grunt" and "(Have You Met) Horror James?", from Thank You (1995), with formal songwriting credits
 * Neil Hagerty describes the nature of Berman's input to WFMU.
 * Herrema refers to Berman's contributions as a "collaboration" in an interview at Flaunt. She also notes "We Are Real" from American Water is about his relationship with the Royal Trux duo, which she evidently only learned after his death. Matt Thorne confirms Berman wrote a song about his friendship with Royal Trux (without naming it), and says DCB "thought they were the best band of the nineties and wanted to be them." I think it's worth noting, somewhere, Berman's friendship with and admiration for Royal Trux.
 * Unfortunately, I'm not convinced Hang the DJ is high quality enough. If you inspect the credited author/editor you'll find he's the Publishing Director at Faber & Faber, who "has a great personal passion for music." Seems less academic/authoritative and more vanity publishing/pet project. DMT Biscuit (talk) 13:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Will Oldham – "Apocalypse, No!" (also spelled "Apocolypse, No!"), from Joya (1997), uncredited
 * Will Oldham on Bonnie "Prince" Billy (2012), p. 126; "'Apocolypse, No!' began as a single line that David Berman had written on the wall of our house in Charlottesville, when we were supposed to be making a Silver Palace record."
 * Oldham wrote: "The beginning came from D. C. Berman, the rest rushed out in an effort to describe some parts of our complicated dynamic."

That's probably a wrap on that; other stray Silver Jews tracks and appearances would belong with a Silver Jews discography, not a Berman discography.
 * Expanded the discography.

Regarding that "Silver Palace" novelty record mentioned in the previous section: the possibility of a "Silver Palace" collab intrigued me—was it just a joke, was it more serious? Here's what I found: Based on all of the above, Brooklyn Rail provides enough to say that Berman and Oldham cohabitated for a time and had long considered a collaboration under the name Silver Palace, which was never realized.
 * Fizz magazine, November 1994: "I'm going to do another project with Will Oldham (of the Palace Brothers) that's going to be called the Silver Palace."
 * CMJ New Music Monthly, June 1998: "Berman and Will Oldham lived in town [i.e., Charlottesville], working on a new Silver Palace project, which unfortunately hasn't seen release yet."
 * Nashville Scene, April 11, 2002: "At present, he's working on a new book of poetry, preparing a reprint of his first poetry collection, Actual Air, and about to start working with Will Oldham on the collaborative Silver Palace project."
 * Frequency magazine, undated: "No, I don't think anything is going to come out of it [Silver Palace]{{tq|. It seems like a good idea but at a certain point, the reality of a collaboration is always more disappointing than you want it to be. I can't think of any collaborations that were any better than the people who collaborated's individual work. I don't think think it would mix very well. But it was a good idea."
 * Berman to Brooklyn Rail, 2005: {{tq|"Will and I have been friends since a summer in '95 when he came to the town I lived in (Charlottesville) and rented a house and we set out to make a Silver Palace record. Nothing got recorded that summer but we've been close ever since."}
 * GQ, 2018: noted that Oldham's upcoming record Songs of Love and Horror would include "one seriously deep cut from an unfinished collaboration with Silver Jews founder David Berman". Not clear which song it's supposed to be, and whichever one it is, it'd be an Oldham original without any Berman co-writing credit.
 * I've added material from Brooklyn Rail (2005): "a close friendship between Oldham and Berman arose at this time and the two conceptualized a collaborative project, entitled Silver Palace."

{{collapse top|title=Other random findings:|expand=yes}}
 * I found a decently big trove of articles/interviews archived on a fanpage. Some are already used in the article, but many are older print or web sources that are no longer accessible on the live web. Internet Archive has earlier version of the same fanpage collection at its original address. Unfortunately
 * I've only skimmed a few of the articles above, but I was intrigued by "Poetic Groans & Musical Apprehensions" (note: linking to an archived version because its formatting is more readable). It's an article/interview by Robert L. Doerschuk published sometime in early 2000 for AllMusic Zine, a poorly preserved (but evidently legit) endeavor by the folks at AllMusic. From what I can tell, it was AMG's short-lived stab at a sub-site more akin to the web-publishing model of Pitchfork (fka Pitchfork Media at that time), tho the Zine seems to have only lasted from late 1999 to early 2000. The original URL for the Silver Jews article is dead, natch, and regrettably is also missing from the Internet Archive. It seems web traffic issues for the early allmusic.com are partly to blame for the extremely spotty preservation; only the barest hints of the Zine survive, like a promo on the homepage, a well-populated masthead, or a partial article index. Anyway, "tears in the rain" and all that.


 * Here's yet more archived fanpage ephemera via The Reef hosted at virginia.edu. This one interestingly notes Berman contributed some short fiction to The Baffler; the latter link also has some old articles.
 * A pretty remarkable encyclopedic overview of Berman-as-poet, with an in-depth literary analysis of his poem "Snow", can be found at: {{Cite book |editor-last=Dorsch |editor-first=Kristen A. |year=2019 |chapter=Snow |pages=213–231 |title=Poetry for Students |series=Poetry for Students |issn=1094-7019 |volume=60 |publisher=Gale |location=Farmington Hills, Michigan |isbn=978-1-4103-6554-5 |id={{Gale|CX3670300024}}}}
 * Very good for the Actual Air air - less so here, tertiary and all that. I don't think we have to crack out the Marxist critique just yet. Let that be the foley of AFD.


 * At PoetryFoundation.org, Cathy Park Hong's wry comment re Berman's Silver Jews Resignation Letter—{{tq|"I guess one can interpret his decision to turn to muckraking as some serious Oedipal revenge shit"}}—could serve to provide a little of the {{nowrap|"read[ing]}} between the lines" on this issue that {{u|Ceoil}} suggested, in so far as it's a muted skeptical reaction that doesn't take Berman's moral crusading against his father 100% at face value (I'm watching Succession right now and am reminded somewhat of a father–son relationship in that show). That point aside, Hong also echoes a claim made in Poetry for Students: Berman's poetry has been considered an unusually accessible starting point when teaching poetry to college students with no interest in poetry.
 * Hi In the Brooklyn Rail article you linked - good find - Berman actually makes reference to Oedipus, tangentially referring it back to his own experience. Given this and the Oedipal description, I'm sure others made, do you think an image of Oedipus in early life or influences would work? Possible caption: Referencing his experience of reinforced empathy via substantial reading, Berman referenced Oedipus as an example of a character who should do the same to others.[citation] His long-standing conflict with his father has been called Oedipal.DMT Biscuit (talk) 11:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Per Houston Press, there was a stage production of Actual Air by Infernal Bridegroom Productions. Strikes me that there's more than enough for an Actual Air article, and while that's neither here nor there w/r/t this FAC I wonder if you've considered it. I've worked on some poetry-related articles and that seems to me like a fun project.
 * I've considered bringing it to FAC. Doesn't seem to be extraneous, maybe one day. There's other article I'm presently interested in right now.


 * Came across a June 2021 Uncut article about Oldham & Matt Sweeney's Superwolves collab; has some asides on Oldham's early encounters with Berman and the impact of Berman's death. Not essential, but there's at least one good Oldham quote re: Berman's death that may have utility, if not here, then probably elsewhere (e.g. there's no Superwolves article yet).
 * Berman makes stray comments on the Silver Jews' last show in an archived blog post at Nashville Scene.
 * Per Poets.org, a planned second collection of Berman's poetry may have once had the working title Richard Simmons 1950–?.
 * 1998 MTV article – some useful info re American Water and Actual Air, but probably for those specific articles.

Two comments that are non-FAC-essential, more to do with the way Wikipedia is stitched together, but probably worth raising now:
 * This one crossed my mind a few times now while navigating Berman-related pages: would it not make more sense to have a {{tl|David Berman}} template, rather than {{tl|Silver Jews}}? No doubt Silver Jews is a "band" in its own right, but it's also widely seen as Berman's vehicle first and foremost. A David Berman template could also include Purple Mountains, plus related links to e.g. Actual Air, Richard Berman (lawyer), etc. Band membership list for Silver Jews could be retained in a manner à la {{tl|Elvis Costello}} for the Attractions.
 * Has there ever been a proposal to move David Berman (musician) → David Berman and David Berman → David Berman (disambiguation)? Seems like there's a more than decent case to do so under WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.

Last but not least, here's a totally inessential blog piece of no reliability and trivial merit, but just for fun it gives an unusual behind-the-curtain read on Berman's character. Personally I'm shocked and scandalized to learn that David apparently really, passionately loathed Can. No action item here whatsoever, just thought this was mildly interesting.
 * What are the chances: in one of the interviews you linked he mentioned his disdain for Can. I suppose we have all that one or two bands we just don't get. For more of his perplexing music taste. Sometimes Twitter is nice. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

{{collapse bottom}}

Phew. Let me know what you think about any of the above at your convenience. <i style="color:#e7dae0;">—blz 2049</i> <b style="color:#e7dae0;">➠ ❏</b> 02:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

{{Ping|DMT Biscuit}} {{Ping|Buidhe}} (for doing the first part of the file review): Quick note, a few days ago I uploaded four new Berman-related images to Commons: I've already added the signature to the page, but I figure DMT Biscuit should choose which of the three photos to use in the "Early life" section based on his editorial judgment/preference.
 * David Berman (signature).png
 * David Berman (1984–85 yearbook photo - 1).jpg
 * David Berman (1984–85 yearbook photo - 2).jpg
 * David Berman (1984–85 yearbook photo - 3).jpg
 * Wow, this is really going above and beyond the order. Thanks. I've elected to use the first photo. As endearing as heartthrob and Got Milk Berman are, the first is just more fitting for an encyclopedia. DMT Biscuit (talk) 09:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I'll recuse myself from doing any file review for this FAC, but I can summarize the contents and copyright statuses to streamline the process for another reviewer. All of these images are sourced from Berman's 1985 yearbook, a complete digital copy of which is available via Classmates.com (with a subscription). The signature is public domain because most American signature are ineligible for copyright and thus public domain; nothing about Berman's simple signature rises above the threshold of originality required to establish copyright. The yearbook photos of Berman entered the public domain because the yearbook was first published in the US between January 1, 1978–March 1, 1989, without a valid copyright notice (this can be verified if necessary by inspecting the complete scan at Classmates.com), and copyright on the yearbook was not subsequently registered within five years. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:Aldus;background:linear-gradient(#6B818C,#000);padding:0 .5em 0 .2em;border-radius:9px"><i style="color:#e7dae0;">—blz 2049</i> <b style="color:#e7dae0;">➠ ❏</b> 02:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I'm confirming that the images listed above are in the public domain and can be used as desired in the article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

{{u|Blz 2049}} - Do you feel like you are in a position to formally support the promotion of this article? Hog Farm {{sub| Talk}} 19:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * {{Ping|Hog Farm}} {{Ping|DMT Biscuit}} Apologies for my recent silence/delay—I've been busy irl{{nbsp}}+ spending time with family{{nbsp}}+ waylaid by a minor case of COVID-19 (I'm on the upswing now). I'm confident I'm reasonably close to a support and I plan to finish my review in the next day or two. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:Aldus;background:linear-gradient(#6B818C,#000);padding:0 .5em 0 .2em;border-radius:9px"><i style="color:#e7dae0;">—blz 2049</i> <b style="color:#e7dae0;">➠ ❏</b> 23:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Some fresh comments:
 * {{tq|"After the release of Purple Mountains he feared he would be seen as a 'sad sack' ..."}} – "sad sack" is a direct quotation from Hyden 2019b, but is a quote from the article author, not Berman himself—yet because the text is about Berman's personal feelings, the sentence reads like "sad sack" is a direct quotation of Berman himself. I'd reword this somehow; the overall point being made in the sentence is germane but it may need a different paraphrase. "Depressive" would be my suggested paraphrase.
 * Done.


 * {{tq|"A number of musicians wrote and recorded tributes in their releases following Berman's death, including:"}} – The list that follows should probably be converted into prose, at least to some extent. It'd be nice to understand a little bit better to what extent and in what sense each cited work was intended as a "tribute" to Berman.
 * Retained the list but with additional prose, per your input. I think the list is best for readability. I have chalked up a prose list, for your consideration:
 * {{tq|"A number of musicians alluded to Berman and wrote tributes in their releases following his death. The Avalanches quoted Berman in their song "Running Red Light". Fleet Foxes recalled Berman's death in their song "Shore"; with "Sunblind", they made allusions to American Water and memorialized Berman; Mogwai memorialized Berman with "Ritchie Sacramento"; Cassandra Jenkins alluded to American Water on “Ambiguous Norway” and recollected her grief on "New Bikini". The Mountain Goats dedicated their song "Arguing With the Ghost of Peter Laughner About His Coney Island Baby Review" to Berman; Daniel Blumberg and John Vanderslice dedicated their respective works On&On and I can't believe civilization is still going here in 2021! Congratulations to all of us, Love DCB to Berman."}}


 * {{tq|"Influences"}} – This section is brief and while it isn't entirely about Berman's poetic influences, that seems to be the bulk of it. Is there more out there about his musical influences? I feel like he's frequently compared to certain artists—Neil Young comes up a lot—but I don't really know who, if anyone, he personally counted as a major influence on his own work. If there's not much to add it may be worth splitting the parts here into the other sections. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:Aldus;background:linear-gradient(#6B818C,#000);padding:0 .5em 0 .2em;border-radius:9px"><i style="color:#e7dae0;">—blz 2049</i> <b style="color:#e7dae0;">➠ ❏</b> 03:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll look. The reason it's a section in of itself is because Berman rarely distinguishes between the two forms. He just says that they're influences. This is primarily why I'd vouch for it remaining. For what it's worth, McCann (2007): "on musical influences, he's cagier, neatly sidestepping the question". DMT Biscuit (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Time to see it clearer and I have axed the section. The poets are in the poetry sections; the artists are by the Witney'. Faulkner gets a little notice to himself amidst mentions of literature and the Torah is entrenched in the talks of Judaism. DMT Biscuit (talk) 13:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments Support from Ceoil
Have had this on my watchlist since before DMT's impressive expansion. Catching up now, with more comments to follow:
 * Lead: In 2009, he announced his withdrawal from music in a public letter expressing his opposition to his father - that's what he said, maybe can we contextualize and read between the lines more.
 * Berman had expressed a dislike/debt to his father during preceding years. Is that what you have in mind?
 * No, more that there were another reasons for the breakdown, but blamed his father (who he had know was a world class prick for years presumably) but blamed him as the trigger in this instance. It does seem like deflection, something he later said, once, to excuse....if not solid and admitted a few times, would leave the claim out of the lead. Ceoil (talk) 01:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Removed the claim from the lead. DMT Biscuit (talk) 12:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Why does the biblo list two works when the lead says that Actual Air was his only published vol of poetry.
 * The Portable February is a book of cartoons. It's a pretty minor release so I feel it doesn't warrant a mention in the lead


 * Critics are not always right. For eg, there is a contradiction here..."his register was baritone and he would concurrently sing and speak. Reviewing Starlite Walker for The Guardian, Jonathan Romney described Berman's approach as "whiny, archetypally slackerish" with "vaguely country inflections". Maybe distinguish between his early and late career singing voices? Ceoil (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't necessarily think this is a contradiction; his register would still be baritone then. He only enunciated it differently, correlating with the country presence in his work. It's also a matter of perception, which the article should strive to reflect.
 * I disagree: most would read whiny as in high pitched and scratchy, as in Neil Young like, which contradicts baritone. Needs clarification. Ceoil (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I've changed the clause to subjective: identified, described so forth.


 * Re live "symbotic" performances with Cassie'; can you attribute the claim
 * The claim was based upon Malitz (2019); removed.


 * from the same passage, what does "incisive gestures" even mean Ceoil (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * "[he made] gestures with his arms that accentuate the punchiness and the hard consonants of the sing-a-long verses" - Chen (2019)


 * Berman publicly announced, for the first time, that his father was the lobbyist Richard Berman - say when
 * Same time as he announced the end of the band. DMT Biscuit (talk) 14:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Leaning support Ceoil (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Support with enthusiasm and the disclaimer that am a long time fan. I echo BLZ's claim above that the article is sensitivity written, aptly for the subject. Ceoil (talk) 22:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Coordinator comment
This has been open for six weeks and has the single general support. I have added it to Urgents, but unless it receives further indications of a consensus to promote forming over the next four or five days I am afraid that it is going to time out. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Support from Moise
DMT, I'm sorry I'm jumping in so late, at the eleventh hour. I'm going to try really hard to finish this review in the next couple of days, and if you can address my comments quickly, who knows, I may be able to support within the time frame set by Gog above. In the worst case scenario, if I've come too late, I guess whatever issues you resolve now will still be helpful towards it being ready soon after. The article has good qualities including being engaging and having good comprehensiveness. I hope the prose comments I've found today in the first part of the article, and any in the rest of my review, will be easy to fix.
 * "Berman ultimately took control of Ectoslavia, having excluded Malkmus and Nastanovich." Can you give more information about "excluded"? The word gives the impression of being aggressive/unfriendly, but it appears their relationship remained good.
 * Unfortunately, there's little information on Ectoslavia so expansion isn't really viable. "Excluded" was extrapolated from Charles (2010): "They formed a noise rock group called Ectoslavia. David eventually took control of the group. He gave Stephen and Bob the heave-ho."
 * : This sentence still bothers me a bit. I see the explanation you give about there not being more information, but I feel the sentence raises more questions than it answers, which is not a good thing. And I'd argue we don't even know for sure what "take control of" or "exclude" mean. He kicked them out of the band? He told them flatly he didn't want their creative input even if they were still in the band? He held some rehearsals with them and some without them so that his own songs were prioritized? We don't know. How would you feel with just stating "The quartet formed the band Ectoslavia", and ending there, since so little is known about the specifics or dynamics of the band anyway? Moisejp (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed, per your reasoning.


 * "Berman recalled a diminished sense of being authentically Jewish." Could you clarify this too?
 * "Berman recalled that while living there he did not feel authentically Jewish" - essentially, he didn't feel like a jew when he lived in New York, for whatever reason.


 * "but gained them attention in a cult-like manner". Not sure the best way to express this. Maybe if in doubt remove the "in a cult-like manner" detail, and just more generally say that it gained them attention?
 * Done. DMT Biscuit (talk) 23:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * "He later characterized his resentment at the erroneous perception of Silver Jews as entitled, noting by 2000 it was less of an issue." Sorry, I'm not totally sure what is meant by this ("entitled" and why was it less of an issue later?). Could you possibly reword it?
 * Berman was very indifferent to the question in the source so there's no real expansion possible; hardly the most important aspect, I exercised cautioned and vetoed it.


 * "The supposed 'centeral command' of art, found at university, he held reservations about." Should this be "central"? This detail is also a little unclear to me. But the passage would seem to flow without it. Could this detail be removed?
 * Thanks for noticing that typo. Personally speaking, I think it's a nice insight into his artistic opinion and time there. By central command, he means university, or more specifically, MFA programmes and the respective professors. I can make that more clear in the prose if you think so.
 * I fixed the typo. Sure, if you could clarify what this means in the text, that'd be great, thanks. Moisejp (talk) 03:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hopefully clarified.
 * I tweaked your edit; I hope it's OK. Moisejp (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "he recollected, in an aloof manner". Does "in an aloof manner" add anything here? It seems unclear who he was being aloof towards or generally what its relevance is.
 * Yeah, not needed. Journalese is a weakness : )

"The resulting pain helped Berman, alongside Malkmus, to formulate a new Silver Jews album". I'm not sure specifically what pain, and resulting from what, is being referred to here.
 * The turmoil caused by The Natural Bridge. Can be removed, if so.
 * I had a stab at rewriting this, see what you think. Moisejp (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yep, good.


 * "his songwriting having been at the foreground of the former album". Should this just be "of the album"? I believe it's talking about American Water?
 * It's referring to The Natural Bridge. Can be removed, if so.


 * "Four years later, proposed with a similar question in an interview". Perhaps it could be made clearer what "similar question" means exactly.
 * Done. DMT Biscuit (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

More comments very soon. Moisejp (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * "later buying a house alleviated quandaries for Berman and the perceived ubiquity and understanding of music as a career was praised by him". This sentence seems a bit confusing, and I'm especially unclear where "was praised by him" fits in with the overall meaning. Moisejp (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hopefully clarified.
 * Sorry, DMT, I promise I'm not trying to be difficult, but I sincerely still don't think I understand this. Does it mean "it was a relief to Berman to live in a city where he felt pursuing a career in music was well accepted"? Moisejp (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that it's it. In fact, I have just copied that over as a better substitute. DMT Biscuit (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "he would soon consider Judaism as that which he would labor over for the rest of his life". Perhaps clarify "that which". Something more specific about the role it played in his life. For example, was it "the pillar which he would labor over"? (That's just an example off the top of my head.) Moisejp (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * :* Hopefully clarified.


 * "in defiance of his sobriety". Not sure the nuance intended here; clarification may be good. Not sure if sobriety only refers to alcohol or can also refer to an absence of drugs. If it can include drugs, then there's a contradiction in "his sobriety", as he was not actually sober. Or if sobriety doesn't include drugs, and only includes alcohol, still not sure whether this means an intentional (literally "defiant") defiance, or a more passive one, or whether such a decision constitutes a defiance at all (if it happens sobriety only refers to alcohol, he wasn't technically being inconsistent with the policy of sobriety). Moisejp (talk) 20:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Removed the notice altogether. As you say, the defiant nature is ambiguous; he was "only 100% sober for Tanglewood Numbers", otherwise there's the implication of sporadic intake of either drugs or alcohol. Was he defiant in sobriety? Yeah, but it's not worth mentioning.


 * "In 2005, Jeremy Blake enlisted Berman for Sodium Fox, an artwork centered around Berman." What kind of artwork was it?
 * Conceptual.


 * "Blake's suicide and Berman's eye operation would affect the next Silver Jews album." What kind of effect did it have? Moisejp (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Blake's suicide is merely noted as a "profound influence" - I imagine you could surmise the effect a suicide would have upon a creative work. Berman discussed his feelings of withdrawal as a result of the eye condition, which assumedly would be absent following the operation; I've mentioned that. DMT Biscuit (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "Berman's decision to tour, no longer dependent on drugs, was based upon his greater age—which to him meant he was "uncorruptable"—his expanded discography, and the infuriation caused by separation from his audience." I'd suggest clarifying how being "uncorruptable" was relevant, and what "infuriation caused by separation from his audience" means. OK, I see now that there is a little more info in the sentences following this, and in the footnote, but I still found it a bit much to sift through to try to figure out what it means. Maybe try to make this part a little more compact and direct. Moisejp (talk) 21:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hopefully clarified.


 * "Berman reported being indebted to Richard and once donated to a supposed investigation of Richard." Seems unclear to me. The paragraph is about how he didn't like his father, but this sentence suggests he had some feelings of gratitude towards his father, without going into any details about how this fits in with a bigger picture of their relationship. Also "supposed investigation of Richard" seems cryptic—more clarification is recommended here too. Moisejp (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * "Indebted" here is literal; Berman owed money. Made clear who made the investigation. DMT Biscuit (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * How about changing "reported being indebted to Richard" to "reported owing Richard money"? Then there's less ambiguity, as "be indebted to" can mean other things than financial debt. Moisejp (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Done.


 * "His public perception became intertwined with fabrications—significant speculation upon the events of his suicide attempt had reportedly occurred before this time." Is there more info about the specifics of the speculation? And I'm not sure that "fabrications" is appropriate here, as it suggests probably intentional untruths as opposed to just misguided speculation.
 * There's no more on the suicide: "After battling depression and other demons, Berman allegedly took an intentional overdose of drugs and tried to end it all at a Nashville hotel in 2003. There are many theories about what really happened". There she wrote. Changed fabrications to fiction. DMT Biscuit (talk) 06:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "Berman intended to write new Silver Jews songs, for an undisclosed purpose". I'm not sure what "for an undisclosed purpose" means. I think most people's albums don't necessarily have a "purpose" other than being a collection of songs, even if there may be a theme to the album or artistic bent. So I'm not sure if it adds anything here to say "for an undisclosed purpose", which implies there was a purpose but doesn't say what it was. Moisejp (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Removed.


 * "positioning himself as adjacent to Jews". Not sure what "adjacent" means here.
 * From the man himself: "I’m not Jewish. In a way “silver Jews” has become a category for me of someone who’s a fellow traveler of the Jews...A non-Jew applying for status."


 * "I've got a credit card rotisserie system that would dazzle the ancients". I think this means where you borrow from one card to pay off another, but will this be clear enough to all readers? Is there a related article you can wiki-link to?
 * There isn't a related article. Do you think it should be converted to prose?


 * "In the wake of Berman’s death ... His voice never felt louder or more vital", said ." I think the speaker is missing here? Moisejp (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, kind of. It was Sodomsky and such a notice proceeds the quote. "said" is a typo, very "The Grauniad"-eseque.


 * For the bulleted list the Posthumous Tributes section, I recommend mentioning specifically what song(s) on each album referred to Berman (or otherwise acted as a tribute to him). Otherwsie it may imply each album was one big tribute to him. Moisejp (talk) 22:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Wrote that the tributes are in the albums, rather than as a whole, for sake of ease. So much translation, so much to be lost. DMT Biscuit (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

More:
 * "due to the disorder of his associates". I think I know what this is supposed to mean, but maybe could you reword this for additional clarity? Moisejp (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hopefully clarified.


 * "Purple Mountains is Berman's most direct, conventional album, although all of his discography is relatively conventional." Suggest attributing this to Kornhaber and Rothband within the text itself, since this is could be considered a quite subjective statement.
 * "Silver Jews' songs were often sparse and deceptively simple". Can you qualify "deceptively"? Or at least attribute this to the person who said it within the text, as this also sounds like it could be subjective. Moisejp (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed as it's implicit and, as you say, ambiguously objective.


 * "Berman understood his musical abilities were limited, the nature of which was initially obscured by the lo-fi sound.[168] For a while, he questioned as to why he was without natural talent, eventually renouncing his self-consciousness." Neither of these sentences are as clear as would be ideal. The unclear parts for me are "the nature of which was initially obscured by the lo-fi sound" and "eventually renouncing his self-consciousness".
 * Hopefully clarified.


 * "His austere style proved to be influential." It feels like this sentence could be removed or merged into somewhere else where his influence is discussed. If you'd like to keep it here as it is, I feel it needs a good more amount of detail about how it was influential.Moisejp (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed


 * "For the first four Silver Jews albums, Berman wrote all the songs—to Malkmus' gratitude who comparative to Pavement played more melodic and simple material." The second half of this sentence is very awkwardly structured and would require some rearrangement.
 * Removed the second half, better suited for the Silver Jews article.


 * "With Tanglewood Numbers, Berman exercised greater care and control, in regards to its final state". Here "in regards to its final state" doesn't seem clear. So that means he exercised more care and control to the final state, as opposed to earlier states? Not sure what the relevance is. Moisejp (talk) 23:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed.


 * Is there a synonym you could use for "loquacious"? It feels like an unnecessarily hard word that I admit I had to look up (but it may just be me).
 * Switched for talkative, although that may be too informal.


 * "The pair having "shared a brightening chemistry". Consider mentioning Cassie before mentioning "the pair", because the last pair that was mentioned was Malkmus and Berman.
 * Done


 * "him embellishing a concert documented on the film Silver Jew with incisive gestures". I don't think this works well as is. Maybe just a new sentence with a bit more context added.
 * This has been brought up before as vague; removed, as a result


 * "started writing poems because [he] wanted to make poems so good they would make everyone else quit. I don't have the voice or the technical skills to blow people away with my music. But I have a chance to do that with my poetry". It's not always easy to switch person (here "I" in the quotation to "he" in the narrative of the text) and I also don't always know the perfect solution. But in this particular case I think the fact that it switches from "he" to "I" within the same quotation is a little more problematic than is acceptable. Moisejp (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Removed


 * "Heidi Julavits noted that Berman often distorted familiar concepts in his poetry". Are there any examples for further context?
 * See below


 * "The world concocted, analogous to that featured in his songs, is eccentric—with "plausible contexts" quickly altered by "an odd word" and domestic scenes "tinged with gothic weirdness".[191] The collection, which treads "between surrealism and confession", "reads like a novel written in two-sentence paragraphs". Like for my comment above, this passage has too much high-level description without enough tangible examples or details that the readers can sink their teeth into to really grasp what it means. Also the second sentence with two quotation separated by a comma feels awkward. And maybe here too cite some of the stuff to such-and-such writer directly within the text.
 * Included examples of imagery; included poem except which is noted in the text. Removed the first quote in the second sentence and converted the second quote to text, although with attribution.


 * "Berman's poetry has amassed admiration, being praised by Dara Wier and Billy Collins". I'd argue "amassed" suggests lots of people's admiration, but then "being praised by" (which sounds like it is supposed to be a qualifier of what precedes it) only mentions two people. The ideas are good, but I'd suggest rearranging the text a bit so that the two halves of the sentence mesh better. Moisejp (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Swapped around.

I think that's all qualms resolved. DMT Biscuit (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Second read-through:
 * Small issue, but Pavement's introduction is in the sentence "Though Berman sometimes felt irritated by a common view that Silver Jews were merely a side project to Malkmus's more popular band Pavement" but if the reader reads the footnotes as they appear in the text, there is already mention of the band in footnote a (which is written to sound like the band has already been mentioned). Sometimes footnotes can be tricky (for me too) in terms of the assumed ordered that the info is read. The easiest solution might be if you can somehow fit in a mention of Pavement before footnote a. But if you can't make that work, I won't insist on this point. Moisejp (talk) 03:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Was able to mention Pavement right before the footnote; both bands arose almost concurrently.


 * Likewise, in footnote c, Open City is mentioned as though it has been mentioned before, but it is not introduced with a wiki-link until the middle of Critical acclaim and substance abuse: 1996–2001. Moisejp (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Wiki-linked and described them as "a publisher of Berman's poetry".


 * In footnote b, could "similar but greater status" be clarified? Moisejp (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's now a remnant of a past state. Remember "cult-like manner", we etched it out earlier; that was the relevant status. From the source: "The albums have become cult favourites...making it easier for him to recruit musicians." The footnote is a bit liminal now; do you think it should remain?
 * I removed the footnote. Moisejp (talk) 02:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Mini-suggestion to paraphrase "who no longer '[had] to work'" instead of using a direct quote, which feels unnecessary here. (Maybe "who no longer felt he needed to work"? But perhaps clarify what work refers to. Does it mean having a side job, on the side from his poetry and music—these could also be considered "work" depending on the intended scope.) Moisejp (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The source only refers to a general sense of "work", although one could guess it refers to wage labour. Maybe that could be wiki-linked or is that getting a bit original research-y.
 * I have tentatively added the wiki-link. I think it should be okay, but if anyone reading this disagrees, it can be reverted. Moisejp (talk) 02:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "He said that he "always ... would stop before we got bad" " Should this be something like "he always said he "would stop before we got bad"? Moisejp (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Just ported over the original quote. The ellipsis isn't needed.


 * "Reflective of Silver Jews' impact on Nashville's mid-2000s music scene, the final show meant "a chapter in this city’s artistic evolution closed""." Not sure what "reflective" means here. Does it mean Maloney reflected on the impact, and came up with this conclusion? (I'm guessing it's this?) Or perhaps that Berman reflected on this? Or that the Silver Jews were reflective/representative of the Nashville music scene? In any case, I'd argue the word "reflective" may not work here, and that it would be better to clarify in the text itself whose conclusion it is about "a chapter in this city’s artistic evolution closed". Moisejp (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Provided attribution and changed "reflective" to "due to". DMT Biscuit (talk) 22:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

I think that's all qualms resolved. DMT Biscuit (talk) 12:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Update for Gog the Mild: Hi Gog, I'm expecting to support, but if I could have a few more days to finish off my second read-through, that would be great. I was hoping to finish it today (the last day of the holidays!), but it's a long article. But I can say DMT Biscuit has been very good and quick about responding to my comments, so I'm pretty confident that within a few days it's likely I'll be able to wind up this review and, I expect, declare support. Thanks. Moisejp (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * No problem . I wouldn't want to promote unless all reviewers were entirely happy - or I understood why they weren't and was was prepared to discount it - and I wouldn't want to rush them into a premature oppose or support. Take your time and let's do it right. Thanks for keeping me informed. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Getting close to the end:
 * "The pair had differing approaches and were "longtime musical foil[s]"." Does "the pair" refer to Berman and Malkmus? Was direct mention of Malkmus accidentally edited out of this section? (Or possibly Cassie and Berman?) Moisejp (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The direct mention of Malkmus had been edited out (see above), thus "the pair" was an oversight. DMT Biscuit (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)


 * "He expressed ambivalence toward his inability to reach a larger audience and had amassed a reputation as "perhaps the finest lyricist of his generation" with his diligence being a frequent point of discussion." Not sure why these two points are side by side? If the two ideas are closely related, I'm not sure how. Would one of the points be better moved to elsewhere in this section? Moisejp (talk) 04:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved the latter down. DMT Biscuit (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

OK, I've finished my second read-through. Hopefully tomorrow I'll try to look at your final recent changes and comments. Moisejp (talk) 04:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

All right, all of my concerns are now addressed, and I'm happy to support on prose and comprehensiveness. Moisejp (talk) 02:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments and support from Gerda
This caught my attention, although or because I know nothing about the subject. I finally have a bit of free time, - still silently hoped to see many supports (and then skip to the next three waiting). As this is not so, here we go, - I'll skip the lead and comment as I read. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Infobox
 * fine, but I miss the bolded names from the lead

TOC
 * not sure if "rehab" isn't too sloppy
 * Changed to rehabilitation.
 * thank you - general request: please follow indenting as explained at the top of User talk:Drmies. ---GA
 * would expect posthumous after artistry
 * Inclined to agree due to a cursory glance at various FA musical biographies, not that I believe the section constitutes a "legacy": John Lennon, The Notorious B.I.G., David Bowie, Frank Zappa...
 * "Image and self-perception" - to me, "Image" adds nothing, please explain what I miss
 * Image here pertains to his public image, how others perceived him: fans, critics, whatnot...Hence "self-perception".
 * would it be asking too much to change to "Public image", as image has so many meanings? ---GA
 * Sure. DMT Biscuit (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I was taught to drop "Selective" from such collections, as it makes a reader ask selected by whom by which criteria
 * Done. DMT Biscuit (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * This one was my bad, I added the word. Will be sure to refrain from doing so in the future. <span class="nowrap" style="font-family:Aldus;background:linear-gradient(#6B818C,#000);padding:0 .5em 0 .2em;border-radius:9px"><i style="color:#e7dae0;">—blz 2049</i> <b style="color:#e7dae0;">➠ ❏</b> 23:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Silver Jews
 * "Berman's personal life was affected by the deaths of friends, which would influence his songwriting; a close friendship between Oldham and Berman arose at this time and the two conceptualized a collaborative project, entitled Silver Palace." - I don't see a connection between the two things mentioned.
 * Resolved.

Acclaim need a break --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * "Poetry can never counter propaganda. A song might be able to". - that quote remains a bit too unconnected. If to stay so, the full stop should be within the quotation marks.
 * The quote's intended purpose is to highlight how he distinguished songwriting and poetry, as mentioned in the preceding sentence.
 * "Cassie was a source of relief for Berman and she helped him feel young, later considering their relationship the "best thing that ever happened to me"." - not sure if he or she speaks in the quote
 * Resolved.
 * "including Robert Bingham, the founder and editor of Open City,[55] who died in 1999 after a heroin overdose. Malkmus and Berman performed at Bingham's wedding." - sounds to me as if Bingham first died, then married
 * Cut on account of being trivial. DMT Biscuit (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for good discussion and changes, all fine so far, - will read further now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Attempted suicide
 * "his sobriety made him more receptive to candidness" - English isn't my first languish, and I am not sure I understand this bit.
 * Being sober made him more willing (receptive) to be open in interviews (candid) about his struggles.
 * ...allowed him to be more candid in interviews? Ceoil (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * "Beyond the shocking events, the public confession alone seems wildly in contrast to Berman's 1990s persona. "Getting sober is the end of many different privacies," he says. "You're exhausted with privacy."". DMT Biscuit (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * "Before Berman toured, he occasionally made caricatures of fans, considering it more rewarding." - what's "it" here?
 * Caricatures - changed it to them
 * "Blake's suicide and Berman's eye operation would affect the next Silver Jews album—before the operation, Berman reported feeling "less aggressive and less tenacious"." - I read that a few times, but am not sure how the surgery "would affect", or rather his feelings before? - Nor the other's suicide. - Clarify?
 * This has been flagged up before, almost verbatim. Unfortunately, the sources don't expand. As a result, do you think this should be removed?
 * The last three paras: first deals with tours, second with finances and an album to come, third with tours again. Why?
 * Personally speaking, regarding biographies, I like to have a sense of a chronological timeline and overview separated. Thus, in that section, the first four paras showcase the successive events - imagine the view of a voyeur - while the final para collects and provides context and an overview of the preceding events. It's just a style, admittedly idiosyncratic; I can change it, if you so desire.
 * Within the last: do we really say "greater age"? (may be my lack of language), and how does expanded discography explain the decision to tour?
 * Eh, "older age" has connotations of world-weariness and whatnot; "greater age" just appears more objective. His expanded discography simply means that he had more songs to play. Berman was hardly the most prideful, makes sense that he would want a large pool to choose from.

Hiatus
 * "Upon considering the commercialization of modern musicians, he began to see his and Richard's lives intertwining; this, alongside his guilt about his father, were the reasons he retired Silver Jews, saying:" - I understand the quote that follows better than this rather complex construction, in which a singular "this" doesn't match a plural "were". I don't quite get what the commercialization has to do with his father. I also wonder how we could avoid calling his father by just first name, while the son goes by last name.
 * From the source: "Berman’s explanation of his departure from music led to his central subject. Contemporary musicians, he disparaged, were “expected to become entrepreneurs.” The increased commercialism he saw while performing brought him to a daunting conclusion: “My dad’s world has subsumed my world."
 * "In 2010, he spoke about his difficulties with writing about his father—seeking to become his "nemesis"; HBO nearly adapted the book" - which book?
 * Oops. Those writings pertain to a planned book. Oversight on my part; sometimes, notions become so commonplace you neglect to mention them. Oh well, spoiled milk.
 * If Cloud was important enough to adopt the name, do we know a bit more about their friendship? I suggest to show "Cloud" in the infobox if in the first sentence.
 * No, not really. It seems he was a personal friend, compared to the likes of Malkmus. For a noted recluse he did have many friends; sometimes he was "tantamount to cordial".

Purple Mountains
 * The quote right below the title seems to match the last sentence of the previous section well.
 * I'm inclined to agree. Amended.
 * "while he considered her part of his family and was "all [he] had"" - "her" doesn't work with "was all", - rephrase, perhaps without a quote?*
 * Amended
 * "Auerbach has called Berman "one of [his] heroes"" - why not "Auerbach called Berman ..."?
 * No real reason; change made.
 * New York's Met Breuer Museum - will that become a blue link?
 * No real intention from me. Weird remmenant, gone now.

need another break -- ... needed it so badly that I forgot to sign. I'm on my morning watchlist round, thanks for the replies, and most already settle the concerns. I'll be back later for the few others, and hopefully also can read further. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I read now to the end, and found those sections much easier. I'm ready to support at this point, which doesn't mean we can't talk on this or that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Coord note
The article still needs a review of non-free media and a source review, which I've asked for at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Image and source check requests. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Non-free media review (pass)
I believe the audio samples are the only pieces of non-free media, but please let me know if I have overlooked something. I appreciate that you have put in timed text for both songs. The only issue is the "Random Rules" sample is a tad too long, but once that is handled, this should pass my review. Aoba47 (talk) 00:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * File:Random Rules.ogg: The audio sample has a clear caption which demonstrates its purpose in the article that supports its inclusion. However, the sample is too long. According to the MOS guideline on music samples, audio samples can only be 10% of the length of the original song. From my understanding (and please correct me if I am wrong), "Random Rules" is 3:59 and 10% of that is 23.9 seconds so the current sample is roughly three seconds too long.
 * File:All My Happiness is Gone.ogg: This audio sample also has a clear purpose in the article as supported by its caption. This one meets the length requirements as "All My Happiness is Gone" is 4:20 and 10% of that is 26 seconds. Since the current audio sample is 20 seconds, it meets the non-free media rules.
 * Ammended the files. The first stanza of a poem, "New York, New York", is cited in the text. I don't know to what degree that constitutes "non-free media" but maybe something worth discussing. DMT Biscuit (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing my point about the "Random Rules" audio sample. The placement of the "New York, New York" stanza within the "Poetry" sub-section does a good job in clearly demonstrating its purpose in the article. This FAC passes my non-free media review. Unfortunately, I am unable to do a source review (as I am not quite experienced enough in that area to do a good job with it), but I hope this review was helpful. Best of luck with the FAC! Aoba47 (talk) 02:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Source review—passed
To come. are spot checks required? SN54129 12:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Strictly speaking, no, since they've had a promoted FAC in the past. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Jenkins, Shattuc & McPherson needs the publisher's  parameter filled in.
 * Resolved. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't think I can find a bad source among the—phenomenally extensive—selection used. These include, but are not limited to, institutional sources (Academy of American Poets, Billboard, etc), newspapers (The Guardian,  The Philadelphia Inquirer, Los Angeles Times,  The Globe and Mail,  Washington PostMother Jones.  etc), and other literature (Slate,  Politico, Stereogum, etc) is generally of the quality of papers of record or specialists inn their select fields. I can't find any use of primary sources, indicating that either there are none or so few as to be trivial.
 * There are one or two (?) primary sources: liner notes to verify credits and such. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

I'm quite impressed by the layout, particularly the technique of bundling quotes with internal commentary as what they discretely support. Original.
 * To be fair, it was Blz who imparted the insight of bundling quotes. DMT Biscuit (talk) 15:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

No spot checks per co-ord. SN54129 14:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments and copyright review by Buidhe

 * Copyright review: Close paraphrasing from (the bit about the security guard)
 * So, I was coming along to promote this article but I noticed something that gave me pause: the length of the notes section. While it's not wrong to have a few notes, 18 of them is definitely too many. Most of these should either be cut or integrated into the article. As a general rule of thumb, if it's important enough to mention at all, it should be mentioned in the article text. Some of the notes are of questionable value, such as note n.: "Berman and Roberts identified a "miniature" quality to Berman's poetry" What does this even mean? The note on touring especially seems important to put in the article because without reading the note we don't know that he changed his mind on this issue. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  00:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hopefully resolved both. Most notes faced the axe, on account of being trivial or more well-suited for the Silver Jews article; four of them: The mention of touring, advertisement, lo-fi sound and "Jewish tradition" were integrated into the text. You can find them in the respective sections: Critical acclaim and substance abuse: 1996–2001, Public image and self-perception, Purple Mountains and death: 2018–2019.
 * Might be up to you to check if this can be promoted since Hog is on vacation and I recused :) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Simpson is listed under Sources, but not cited. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah. That citation was featured in one of the aforementioned notes that meet the chopping block; hashed out the other stray sources, as well.

Gog the Mild (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)