Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/David Hume/archive1

David Hume
Good A-Class. Eyu100 04:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks promising to me. The prose is interesting and flowing. The section organization is odd though:
 * Footnotes should be at the bottom, shouldn't they?
 * References are partly numbered, partly bulletized... if the bulleted ones are not referenced, don't they belong in "Further reading"?
 * David Hume - isn't this supposed to appear sometime further up, rather than after the "See also" and "Further reading" sections?
 * --Zvika 15:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Object: I think that the article would need a section on Hume as an historian: Hume's history was one of the best fruits of 18th century historiography, and deserves to be discussed. Also, I find Piotrus' points very sound.--Aldux 11:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. Not enough references: there entire unreferenced sections. Perspectives has lots of tiny paras, and works is a not-very-pretty-but-long list.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)