Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Don Tallon with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 23:51, 26 April 2009.

Don Tallon with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948

 * Nominator(s):  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 03:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Part of Invincibles Advert FT drive......Tallon was the main wicket-keeper in the team.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 03:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * FAC on the other reserve wicket-keeper in the team. The issues raised there about thet cites are the same here, the stats were a comparison of hte performance of the two cricketers.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 03:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * FAC on the other reserve wicket-keeper in the team. The issues raised there about thet cites are the same here, the stats were a comparison of hte performance of the two cricketers.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 03:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: Request withdrawal: I believe that the issues should be resolved in the Saggers article before consideration is given to this one. Brianboulton (talk) 10:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Withdrawal is another thing, but for now this is up here. So what's the deal with reference 38. It says: Cashman, pp. ??. Mm40 (talk) 13:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments - I also think it should be withdrawn, per "Users should not add a second FA nomination until the first has gained support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed." At the time of the nomination, Ron Saggers with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948 had one support—hardly what I'd consider substantial. Having two articles with the same issues on FAC at once is inconvenient for everyone involved.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 21:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Actually, its the third nom, there's also Hue chemical attacks. Sasata (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Tech. Review
 * 0 disambiguation links were found with the dab finder tool.
 * 0 dead external links were found with the links checker tool.
 * 0 ref formatting errors were found with WP:REFTOOLS.-- T ru  c o   02:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment: it means absolutely nothing, but I think this is a little discouraging for an FA. Reywas92 Talk 16:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: is there such a thing as too much referencing --Thanks, Hadseys 20:23, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.