Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show)/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Sarastro1 via FACBot (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2017.

Double Dare (Nickelodeon game show)

 * Nominator(s): — 'Chad1m EmailTalk Cont. 15:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

This article is about, arguably, the most popular American kids' TV game show ever, Double Dare. It helped jump-start the media behemoth known as Nickelodeon and, 30 years later, still has a long-lasting effect on a generation of young adults. I crafted this article from the bottom-up, practically by myself (with assists from Bcschneider53 and Twofingered Typist), taking a mess with very few citations six months ago and turning it into what I feel is a very well-crafted and cited article on how Double Dare worked, its history and current evolution, and the impact it has had on television and culture. The GA process went really well and even though the first FA nomination stalled, I'm optimistic about this time around. I took some comments from the first try into consideration and have bettered it further, I think. Thank you! — 'Chad1m EmailTalk Cont. 15:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Image review
 * File:Double_Dare_logo.png: n/a and empty parameter should be filled in. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Updated. Thank you! — 'Chad1m EmailTalk Cont. 15:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Closing comment: This FAC has been open for over a month, and has been on the urgent list for nearly two weeks, but has not attracted any support or anything other than an image review. Therefore, I think it is best to archive this now. I would recommend taking it to PR and asking some experienced FAC reviewers, or even a mentor from the mentoring programme before renominating. That might get things moving more quickly next time around. In any case, this can be renominated after the usual two-week waiting period. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Sarastro1 (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.