Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dragon Ball Z/archive1

Dragon Ball Z
Fastnaturedude 01:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC) Fastnaturedude
 * Support I nominate this acticle because it is very well written. I think that this should be a featured article.
 * Object, no references. I don't have to go farther than that... Tito xd (?!?) 02:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Support No references? Oh really? Fastnaturedude 03:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The article has been a good article candidate that failed, with concerns that appear not to have been addressed. The article fails 1c (verifiability, no enough references) and 3 (Image:Dragonballz.jpg does not have a fair use rationale). -- ReyBrujo 04:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, external links are not references. YoBub 05:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Refer to Peer Review First! Not only no references, but also stubby sections and subsections.UberCryxic 05:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong object Setting aside the lack of references, there's no discussion of plot, character, development or reception. Too much information (and uncited speculation) about distribution.--Monocrat 06:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong object. No way is this a FA quality article. In addition to the comments above, almost 3/4 of the article is extremely list & table heavy... Please write (mostly) in prose. Also, the lead needs some serious work. Mi kk er (...) 09:33, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Object - Yes, you don't have any references. No in line citations.  Horrible, ugly cast table.  Lots of bulleted lists.  Not to be mean, but I wouldn't pass this for GA.  Please send this to peer review. --PresN 21:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Object as per Mikkerpikker. Merosonox 07:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Object: Needs at least a plot summary and information about characters not just a cast list and saying that it is a continuation of Dragonball and they save Earth and other planets. Orfen  User Talk 02:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)