Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eurovision Song Contest 2013/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC).

Eurovision Song Contest 2013

 * Nominator(s):  Wes Mouse &#124; T@lk 05:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

This article is about the Eurovision Song Contest 2013, which is currently at GA status. The article has since been expanded further, and also includes information on the official album release for that particular contest.  Wes Mouse &#124; T@lk 05:27, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Note - Have you read the FAC instructions? In particular where it says: "None of the nominators may nominate or co-nominate any article for two weeks unless given leave to do so by a coordinator". Your previous FAC was archived yesterday. Graham Beards (talk) 08:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * sorry for the confusion. All this FAC thing is rather new to me.  The previous FAC which is now archived also confused me somewhat, as all the issues that were raised, got addressed; yet nothing else came of it.  Not sure if it became lost and forgotten.  If this needs to be withdrawn, or postponed for 2 weeks, then I am fine with that.   Wes Mouse  &#124; T@lk 09:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Wes, the two-week period between nominations is not to punish people whose noms have just been archived; rather we want the nominator to spend time addressing concerns with the archived nom, or addressing possibly similar concerns with any other article they might nominate. As Graham points out, the FAC coordinators can grant leave to nominate the same or another article in less than two weeks, but that's generally if there's been little or no feedback for the recently archived nom. You previous nom did have feedback, and in fact the last comment suggested a copyedit. So I will pull this one for now, and encourage you to pursue a couple of possibilities for the article over the next couple of weeks, such as a copyedit from the GOCE, and/or a Peer Review, before considering re-nominating for FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 12:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.