Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Freemasonry/archive2

Freemasonry
See Archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - Others

Strongly Object, it's only just lost FA status for the very good reason that it's suffered badly from vandalism recently and has some significant improvement to make before it's worthy of consideration.ALR 22:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Strongly Object. This has to be a joke... the article is a mess due to recent vandalism and POV postings.  It needs a lot of work before it is worthy of being featured.  In fact, it is currently up for being dropped from the former featured list because it is such a mess. Blueboar 22:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Strongly Object per Blueboar. Ardenn 01:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Strongly Object wha???? That link you linked to shows 1 keep vote and 2 remove votes, I really don't understand the point of this at all. It lost FA status less then 24 hrs ago.  Seraphim  01:28, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Would love to see it featured, but in it's current state I must object. After the mess left by POVing vandals and the resulting editwars, it's going to take time to bring this article up to FA-level; even more so because the bar has been raised significantly since it was made a FA the first time. WegianWarrior 11:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)