Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Geo Storm/archive1

Geo Storm
Since the image problems have been ironed out, I believe that it is now ready to be a featured article. --Karrmann
 * ''First FA nomination
 * I don't think there's enough substance for it to be an FA.Osbus 02:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What things should be added to the article to make it more substantial; i.e. what would you recommend adding? Remember, objections should be specific enough for the issues to be fixed. Evenprime 04:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe some of what Staxringold said, but I think (probably wrong, since I'm not an expert on cars) this is a rather narrow topic. Osbus 00:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Oppose While I still feel my issues from the last FAC have been ironed out, this is far too fast to be re-nominating. In addition, it really could use more meat on its bones. I can't say what, but that isn't part of my opposition. Maybe Geo Storm's in pop culture, development/design process for the car, development/design process for what replaced it, etc, etc. Staxringold 22:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak object; I think this article is quite comprehensive and well referenced. However, I'd like to see some sales statistics (something more substantial than "The Storm sold well and was popular with owners". Some car development information would be nice too, as Staxringold said. —Spangineer[es]  (háblame)  01:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)