Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Graffiti/archive2

Graffiti
Self Nomination

Hi everyone,

I came accross this article a little while ago and, after learning that it's a former featured article, I decided to restore it to its former glory. I rewrote it, added refs etc., and it's just gone through peer review. I think that this would a good featered article because it's well-written, covers an important topic, and has lots of useful information on it. What do you guys think? Thanks,

 Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 06:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you, but I see an evidence of tags at the bottom. Would you mind fixing that?--Rmky87 15:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness, but seriously, this needs to be taken care of, and why is the template still there?--Rmky87 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the citation template has been removed, but where is this aforementioned tag? I can't seem to find it.  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 00:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Here. It's the only one I could find.--Rmky87 13:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's been fixed. Anything else?  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 14:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing I can see, which unfortunately does not mean that nothing is there.--Rmky87 18:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, this wasn't listed on the FAC page, listing now. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Object for being not comprehensive. It covers ancient graffiti only in ancient Rome, then briefly alludes to Mayans and skips straight to the 1970s.  The only coverage of Asia is about an American being lashed in Singapore. Tuf-Kat 08:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, insufficient referencing. Graffiti has no sources, as does most of the section before it, so it comes off as original research. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Acually it was listed on the FAC page, but removed yesterday as a fail from Raul, redelisting.