Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Harbhajan Singh


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 05:45, 9 March 2007.

Harbhajan Singh
This article has had a peer review Peer review/Harbhajan Singh/archive1, it has been copyedited by ALoan, and the article is a comprehensive account of the life and career of India's most successful off spin bowler and the first Indian cricketer to take a Test hat trick. It is part of WP:CRIC's CWC Advert FA Drive for the 2007 Cricket World Cup. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Support Good work on the article/bio but can you please fix the two red links, ICC referee already have an article. I think, its icc elite referee or something like that so just redirect it.--Thugchildz 07:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, already done so.. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Well done on a brilliantly written article. Full support.  — N o b l e e a g l e  [TALK]  [C] 08:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'll look into the article content, but at first glance, the article seems to lack images. There are only 3 right now. I understand that you might be excluding FU images, but still, some more images can enhance the article. --Ragib 08:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support - qualifies all criteria. cheers, Casliber | talk  |  contribs 10:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support–Great article. Well done.-- Eva  b  d  14:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support At least as good as Paul Collingwood, which is an FA, so why should'nt this be? к1иg---   f1$н---   £я5ω1fт  16:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support well written article with detailed info. But same problem as ragib, lack of images or more specifically, lack of good quality images -- Agεθ020 ( ΔT  •  ФC ) 22:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Incredible article. I am very impressed. - NYC JD (make a motion) 22:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Interesting, impressive, well qualified for FA--– Dakota 04:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support, I just gave this +GA, and I agree that it probably is FA standards. Nice work!  Daniel Bryant  06:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support--Dwaipayan (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support. I have copyedited, as noted above, but I am sure more eyes would be good.   As I said on the PR, it does seem a little heavy on the statistics (and thus a bit light on the "brilliant prose").  Also query whether a summary of his Test (and ODI?) career statistics, like those at the bottom of Paul Collingwood and Adam Gilchrist would be helpful.  A batting Manhattan graph is unlikely to be very instructive, but what about a similar thing for bowling average? -- ALoan (Talk) 11:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, excellent dedicated work. Well done.  The Rambling Man 19:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support. Nice effort in including a lot of details and weblinks. I would like to see that the controversies and criticisms in his career seperated out at a later point in time.Kalyan 10:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak support - Could use more images though. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  21:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support - A captivating article. Baka man  03:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support but with one comment Genrally speaking, a excellent article. But what does India's most successful off spin bowler in the opening paragraph refer to? The current team or in India's entire history? I suggest someone insert "currently" to make it more clear. GizzaChat  &#169; 07:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Support. Brilliant prose indeed.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   18:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.