Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Howard Florey/archive1

Howard Florey

 * Nominator(s): Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

This article is about Howard Florey, the scientist who led the team that developed penicillin. They developed techniques for growing, purifying and manufacturing the drug, determined its chemical and physical structure, discovered how it worked, tested it for toxicity and efficacy on animals, and carried out the first clinical trials. The development of antibiotics revolutionised medicine and agriculture. His discoveries are estimated to have saved over 80 million lives, and earned him a share of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1945. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  20:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Image review

 * Suggest adding alt text


 * File:Sir_Howard_Florey.jpg: as per the tag given, also needs a US tag and first publication details. Ditto File:Howard_Florey_with_sister_Hilda_on_arrival_in_Melbourne,_1944.jpg
 * Added USRA template. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  04:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)


 * File:Australian_$50_note_paper_front.jpg needs a more expansive FUR. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are asking for here. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  04:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * FUR=Fair Use Rationale. The image is in copyright, so we need to provide a detailed rationale as to why we should be allowed to use it in this specific article. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It's got one. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The one it has should be elaborated on to better justify why a non-free image is justified here, or to turn that around why simply saying he appeared on the note via text is insufficient. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * "It adds significantly to the article, as it illustrates the subject of the image and illustrates a significant cultural reference to Florey." Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I read that. As I said, it should be elaborated to better justify why the image is needed for reader understanding. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * How about: "The image is free and the classification of it as non-free is based on ideology and not reality." Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know what I more need to add to the justification. I did not add it and am not attached to it, and would remove it if I thought it would make a difference. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The image has been removed. This is a shame, as the text won't mean as much to the reader without it, and the article on the $50 note does not cover it. The note is no longer in circulation, so many people have not seen it. Perhaps we should remove the text to avoid confusion.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Prose comments, CT55555
Lots of prose comments, none are critical, all should be considered very mild suggestions:
 * 1) Lead: I think commas are needed after "In 1941", "In 1935" and "In 1962".
 * Did a sweep through the article and added the required commas. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Early life and education: possibly link "South Australia". A mild suggestion.
 * Already linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Early life: should it say "More congenial....to something"? More congenial to her health" perhaps? I'm unsure. A very mild suggestion.
 * I think it is alright. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Early life: comma after "In 1911"
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Rhodes scholar: It surprised me that the 2018 cash equivalent of £300 is given in dollars and not pounds, or both.
 * Dollars replaced pounds in 1966. Back then the Australian pound was tied to the value of gold like the sterling, but after 1929 the Australian pound left the gold standard and the two currencies diverged. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Rhodes scholar: link "cerebral cortex" and to Brain to Brain (journal) and 1924 Oxford University Arctic Expedition to List of Arctic expeditions
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) London Hospital: I don't like one paragraph sections. This could be fixed by breaking it into 2 or more paragraphs.
 * Split paragraph. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * LH: Suggest changing "Florey was unhappy at London Hospital" to something like "Florey was unhappy with working at London Hospital".
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * LS: "...the mercy of..." reads like the reader should know that there are scheduling or reliability issues, but the reader doesn't, so some context/explanation would help.
 * I don't see that; it merely means that his hours had to conform to the timetable. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) UofC: maybe change "a little" to "slightly"? Just a very mild suggestion.
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) UofC: I did expect a comment about the employment of child labour in a medical lab, if that was normal? Legal? Could that be added?
 * According to our article on raising of school leaving age in England and Wales, the school leaving age in the UK was 14 until 1947.
 * 1) UofS first sentence: change "Cambridge" to "Cambridge University" I think.
 * I don't think that is necessary. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) UofS: "not overlooked" is a double negative. Can you say "noticed" or something else?
 * It is a turn of phrase I use a lot. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) UofS: "Top notch" seems a little colloquial, could it be changed for more formal language?
 * Changed to "first rate". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: Should it say "Oxford University"? I think this is about the academic institution, not the city.
 * I guess so. Changed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Throughout: cash equivalents seem to vary between 2018, 2021 and other years. I assume this is unavoidable, but if it is avoidable, would be nice to have consistent years for easier comparisons. Not a critical issue.
 * They are handled by the template. I will see if we can update the Australian one. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: I think it should be "forty to fifty" rather than "forty or fifty" just being logical.
 * Sure. Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: link to Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) here (the first mention) and delink later)
 * Already linked on first use. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: change "obtain" to "employ" or "hire" or "contract" or something like that.
 * I don't think any of those would be correct. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: Is "Henceforth" a bit of a unnecessarily fancy or archaic word to use?
 * Doesn't seem archaic to me. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Throughout be consistent with UK or United Kingdom.
 * Consisted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Oxford: Say "was sometimes strict" rather than "could be strict"? Anyone could be strict, but were they?
 * Changed to "was strict". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Penicillin: I think authorized is not Australian English (i.e. I think authorised is)
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Penicillin: link to gangrene and staphylococcus
 * Already linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Penicillin: "drum up" seems colloquial
 * Changed to "generate". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North American supply: say which war (i.e. WWII)
 * Already said it was the second world war above. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Clinical trials: "case No. 12" I am not sure the abbreviation is optimal. Can you say "their twelfth case" or something like that?
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North Africa: link to Adelaide
 * Already linked above. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North Africa: should "Military Hospital for head injuries" be "Military Hospital for Head Injuries"?
 * Changed to "St Hugh's Military Hospital (Head Injuries)." Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North Africa: I'm unsure but should "military rank" be "a military rank"? or "a military role"?
 * Military rank is correct. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North Africa: link to War Office
 * Already linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) North Africa: Change "made available for Allied invasion of Italy" to "made available for the Allied invasion of Italy" or "made available, ahead of the Allied invasion of Italy" perhaps?
 * Added missing word. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Soviet Union: the one sentence section looks odd, but I understand why it is like that. Is there any way to reduce the number of sections here? (I see maybe there is not)
 * 2) Throughout: the term "the children" I find out of place. Should "his children" be used, that seems more normal.
 * Seems normal to me, but chasged as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Cephalosporin: Should Gram-positive bacteria be capitalised?
 * De-capitalised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Cephalosporin:Should "The Oxford team" be the "The Oxford University team". The article talks about the university and the city, so the need to differentiate exists.
 * I don't think it is needed here. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Cephalosporin: Comma after "By 1978" I think
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) President of the Royal Society: change "...1957, By..." to "...1957. By..."
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Provost of Queens: I think it should be "Provost of Queens College, Oxford"
 * I guess so. Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Provost of Queens: "On the other hand" is out of place, as that is normally a phrase that is followed by a "one one hand..." intro. Maybe something like "Conversely..." would flow better?
 * Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Personal life: I think "cardiac" is more widely understood than "cardiacal" so a mild suggestion to change that, but if you know something that I don't, then ignore this.
 * Changed to "heart". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Personal life: can we be more specific than "the Caribbean", i.e. the country?
 * Source doesn't say. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Honours and awards: "honorary" is not Australian English (note used multiple times)
 * "honorary" is correct in Australian English, per our official Style manual.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Death: I think "of a congestive heart failure" should be "of congestive heart failure" but I am not certain.
 * Deleted "a". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Death: "Although Florey was an agnostic" implies there is a tension between Agnosticism and christianity, but I think that is not necessarily true. I think that it is possible and common to believe in christianity and also to believe that the beliefs of christianity cannot be proven, or known (but still can be believed). Atheists are in tension, Agnostics are not. So the "although" is out of place. I think in some contexts (North American" Agnosticism is colloquially used for "mild atheism" but I think that is not technically correct. I may be in WP:OR territory here, so others should critique my logic perhaps. Later it says "disbelief" so maybe we should call him an atheist?
 * We have an article on Christian agnosticism, but in view of the Church's refusal to place a memorial plaque, I think that the implication of tension between Agnosticism and Anglicanism is justified. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * We have an article on Christian agnosticism, but in view of the Church's refusal to place a memorial plaque, I think that the implication of tension between Agnosticism and Anglicanism is justified. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Overall I found this a very comprehensive article, with maybe just slightly too many sections and occasional use of non Australian-English terms, occasionally too much abbreviation of academic institution names, occasionally very slightly colloquial tone, all very fixable and trivial issues. My comments are borderline pedantic. I found zero major issues with this article. (talk) 23:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking my feedback on board. I note a couple of errors in my comments (commonly things already being linked) and very mild suggestions not agreed with (that's fine by me, all were just suggestions). I am happy that most were accepted and for some to be rejected. CT55555 (talk) 03:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Support with comments from Graham Beards
I found a few errors, which I have taken the liberty of correcting. I am happy to discuss any of these changes.

I was a little shocked to see Florey credited with elucidating the structure of penicillin when it was Dorothy Hodgkin (who won a Nobel Prize for it ). The same error is repeated in the nomination statement at the top of this page!
 * It says that Florey was the leader of the team that did these things; Heatley handled production, Abraham and Chain the chemistry, Florey and Jennings the testing; Hodgkin was part of the Oxford team. Abraham, Baker, Chain, Florey, Holiday and Robinson published the chemical formula in 1942; Hodgkin used X-rays to determine its structure in 1949. I wrote about this in the History of Penicillin article.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Although certainly a collaborator, I am not convinced Hodgkin was part of Florey's research group (team). It was Chain that postulated the presence of the beta-lactam ring and it was Chain who suggested to Hodgkin that she have a go at elucidating penicillin's structure. Hodgkin was not answerable to Florey in the sense implied in the article. The article comes across as a tad to biased in Florey's favour in my view. Hodgkin was awarded the Nobel Prize for determining the structure, she didn't share it with Florey who got his “for the discovery of penicillin and its curative effect in various infectious diseases”, shared with Fleming. Graham Beards (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, you are quite right; Hodgkin worked for the X-Ray Crystallography group. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

There are a couple of sentences (for now), which need some clarification:

Here "While the lysozyme research was successful, it was not fruitful, because while it was lethal to certain bacteria, these were not bacteria that caused illness, and were therefore of negligible concern to medicine." This is vague and possibly not true. What are the "certain bacteria"? Are they Gram-positive? And how do we know that these bacteria are non-pathogenic? Also doesn't "successful" and "fruitful" mean the same thing in this context?
 * The source says: "Meanwhile the research on lysozyme by Roberts and Maegraith — for which he had succeeded in getting a further grant of $1280 from the Rockefeller Foundation in 1936— had proved fruitful. They had succeeded in effecting a considerable degree of puri- fication and in 1937 E. P. Abraham— who was working with Robinson as a DPhil student— succeeded in crystallizing it: he was later to join Florey in the Sir William Dunn School of Path- logy. This provided an appropriate starting-point for Chain, who had completed his snake venom work; he was joined in 1937 by an American Rhodes Scholar, L. A. Epstein (later Falk), in an investigation of the nature and mode of action of lysozyme. They confirmed that it was indeed an enzyme and that its action was directed specifically against a polysaccharide in the cell wall of Micrococcus lysodeikticus and other lysozyme-sensitive organisms. To identify the polysaccharide it was necessary to grow substantial quantities of the bacteria in Winchester bottles— a technique in which the advice of Professor Gardner was helpful— and separate and fractionate the bacterial cells. With this material it was possible to show that the cell-wall component destroyed by lysozyme was a simple derivative of glucose-N-acetylglucosamine. The destruction of this by lysozyme accounted for the disintegration and lysis of the cells originally observed by Fleming. Today, when research techniques are so much more sensitive and versatile, this would not rank as a remarkable achievement but with the techniques available immediately before the last War it was unquestionably a brilliant success. As things stood, however, it was something of a self-contained success; it did not immediately suggest a further line of fruitful investigation. Indirectly, none the less, it initiated new research which was to culminate in the development of penicillin as a chemotherapeutic agent in a class on its own. The distinctive feature of lysozyme was its unusual combination of two properties. On the one hand it was innocuous to human tissue; on the other, it was lethal to certain bacteria. Its disappointing feature was that the bacteria it destroyed were not those of practical significance in medicine."

- Williams, pp. 61-62


 * Our article on Micrococcus luteus says it is a "Gram-positive to Gram-variable, nonmotile, tetrad-arranging, pigmented, saprotrophic coccus bacterium in the family Micrococcaceae." Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Can we say micrococcus and link to it instead of having "certain bacteria"? Something like ""While the lysozyme research was successful, it was not fruitful, because while it was lethal to micrococci these bacteria are not usually pathogenic." Graham Beards (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Sure. Re-worded along the lines suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The point here is a recurring theme in the article; Florey was a scientist, who was interested in research for its own sake. Finding useful things was very much a byproduct of his work. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Here "Abraham and Chain discovered that some airborne bacteria that produced penicillinase, an enzyme that destroys penicillin." The term "penicillinase" is outdated, the enzyme is called "betalactamase".


 * Just following the sources, but penicillinase links to beta-lactamase. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

I noticed that the author was uncertain of the nomenclature used when describing bacteria. There was a mixture of formal taxonomic names, e.g. "streptococcus" and informal common names e.g. "gonococcus". I think I caught them all in my edits, but they might creep back in. If it helps it should be either Streptococcus spp (formal) or just streptococci (informal), and Neisseria gonorrhoeae or just gonococci.
 * Thanks. I think this arose from multiple authors editing the article, but your are quite right about me being uncertain about the nomenclature, or I would have made it mode consistent. Your work is much appreciated. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

There might be more to come from me when I find time. Best regards. Graham Beards (talk) 16:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Although my review has mainly focussed on the accuracy of the microbiology, I think this article is ready for promotion with regard to the other criteria. The nominator has done excellent and admirable work. Graham Beards (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Support with comments by Draken Bowser
Hello. Just a few queries:


 * "He collaborated with biochemist Marjory Stephenson on his lysozyme project.." The use of "his" makes me think, as I'm reading it, that I should already have heard about this project.
 * That's what you get for reading six books on Florey. Added a paragraph on lysozyme. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * "..much less dangerous amyl nitrite.." Could a more specific adjective be used here?
 * If you have one. Had to deal with this at the Research School of Chemistry. Nasty awful stuff, responsible for many deaths, fires and explosions. Added a source on how nasty it is. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * "The erroneous impression given by Fleming that penicillin was a bactericidal enzyme led Chain to consider that it would be similar to lysozyme." While implied by both this sentence and its name, consider specifying that lysozyme is an enzyme at some point before this.
 * The paragraph mentioned above should cover it. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * "Abraham and Chain discovered that some airborne bacteria that produced penicillinase.." I think one "that" needs to go.
 * deleted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

All points addressed. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * An inquiry: Robert P. Gaynes mentions that after Florey elected Heatley as his plus-one for the US: Chain never forgave Florey for leaving him behind, leading to a feud lasting years. Which is not hard to imagine given that Heatly after meeting Chain had refused to work for him, instead electing to report directly to Florey. But Gaynes does not detail the consequences of the quarrel. Was there any significance to this schism? Draken Bowser (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Florey took Heatley to the US with him because he wanted an expert on production, and Heatley was his team member for that. But to Chain penicillin was a joint project between the two of them, and Heatley was just a technician. Added words to this effect. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  10:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

I have nothing further. The article is comprehensive and seems thoroughly researched. Draken Bowser (talk) 10:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Source review
Reviewing this version, spot-check only upon request. It seems like all sources have the requisite information and formatting is consistent. The trove.nla.gov.au source seems to throw a lot of "forbidden" errors. Some sources seem to link PMC twice, first as an ID and second as a link from the article title; dunno that it's necessary. What is source #114 and #158? Is the link to Brett Mason correct? Is this review of Wilson 1976 a problem? Not source-related, but File:Australian $50 note paper front.jpg does not seem to add a lot to the understanding of the article's topic and so might fail WP:NFCC. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Very well. I have removed the image of the $50 note. Many people carried it around for years but never knew who the picture was of or what the surrounding images are about. Now I guess now they will never know. Without the image, the text should probably be deleted as well, as it is no longer intelligible to the reader.
 * I get no errors from the Trove links. (Runs checklinks) We have HTTP 302 status but they work and display on the checklinks page) fine.
 * I don't think the double-linking of PMCs is necessary either, but they are not my doing; they are automatically generated by the card in the cite journal template.
 * Fn 114 is a citation to Macfarlane; fn 158 is a reference to the London Gazette. Is there a problem with them?
 * The link to Brett Mason is correct.
 * I don't see anything problematic about Sydney Selwyn's review. This article is about Florey, with the History of penicillin covered in that article, which unfortunately failed its GA review and has been permanently shelved. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In the case of the PMC links, I'd probably remove the url link from the citation templates. WRT the image, I think folks would probably look at Australian fifty-dollar note rather to find out who he is. WRT the review, it raises some questions about the reliability of Wilson 1976. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The are no url links in the citations in the article; the link generated by the template itself, and local consensus here is insufficient to remove it from a template used by millions of articles.
 * The review of David Wilson's book does not question its reliability. It says that it: "at last sets out the full story of the modern discovery and development of penicillin. It is attractively written - if we ignore uncritically enthusiastic statements about Pasteur which appear intermittently. But nothing is said about earlier discoveries of penicillin."
 * The earlier discoveries are out of scope of this article, having nothing to do with Florey. Other reviews are positive: "It has long been suspected that the accepted description of the discovery and therapeutic use of penicillin is not entirely accurate. Professor Ronald Hare's The birth of penicillin (London, 1970) and Professor Sir Ernst Chain's lecture of 1971 have helped to set the record straight and this book contributes further to the process. The author, who is a science writer and broadcaster, has collected together all the available data and presents what seems to be the most acceptable, detailed account so far available. He has carried out extensive research and presents his facts and conclusions in a lucid, undramatic style, with some documentation. The picture gradually clarifies but there are still problems the resolution of which will probably have to await the demise of all who were concerned with this remarkable venture."


 * "Wilson does a first-rate job of picturing the personalities of Florey, Fleming, Chain and others who kept moving on and off the stage and distinguishing between the mythical and factual elements of the story. The time lag between the discovery and development of penicillin is examined carefully; Wilson explains the scientific atmosphere that militated against faster progress. The problems of manufacturing penicillin are especially well handled."


 * Hawkeye7  (discuss)  20:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, this works then. I thought that the article links were as a "url" parameter, although it certainly surprises me that the templates themselves feel the need to link twice. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, have you finished addressing Jo-Jo's comments? Gog the Mild (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have. All points addressed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Jo-Jo, how is this now? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Seems like this passes, with usual caveats about my unfamiliarity with the topic and lack of spotcheck. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for taking the time to review. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Support Comments from JennyOz
Hi Hawkeye, really enjoyed this article. I used to get Fleming and Florey and their roles mixed, probably the Fl alliteration. You've cured me!


 * That is not uncommon. Now that the influence of the UK on the English-speaking world has waned, fewer people have heard of Fleming. We have a whole suburb of Canberra named after Florey, but the residents don't know how his name is pronounced. I hope that the Wikipedia article will correct this. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

lede


 * post nom FRS - not requesting you to change but why doesn't that link to Fellow of the Royal Society?
 * It should. I have corrected it. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * after the task had been abandoned ten years before - ten years after the task had been abandoned -(just a bit strange with "after" followed by "before") (the "abandoned" relates to "Dreyer had been given a sample of the mould in 1930 for his work on bacteriophages. He had lost interest in penicillin..." not Fleming?)
 * Re-worded. Made it clear that it was Fleming who abandoned work on penicillin. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * They developed techniques for growing, purifying and manufacturing the drug, and tested it for toxicity and efficacy on animals, and carried out the first clinical trials on people. - there are four "and"s in that sentence. Only suggestion, swap "and carried out " to 'then' carried out
 * Deleted one of the "ands". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Early life and education
 * and married Berth Mary Waldham - typo Bertha
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hilda, was born in 1891 - hmm her article says 1890 (I can't see Mcfarlane, pls confirm not a typo)
 * Not a typo; Macfarlane does say "1891". Double-checked against her birth certificate; 6 September 1890 is correct. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * footsteps of his sister, - name Hilda here seeing he had 4 sisters
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * entered St Peter's College, Adelaide[7] where - comma after Adelaide
 * Comma added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This was fortunate; his father died - "fortunate" not good word here?, fortuitous is more apt? or timely, beneficial
 * Rewritten. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * She later became a bacteriologist - later superfluous
 * Deleted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Rhodes scholar
 * this subhead add cap ie Rhodes Scholar
 * Capitalised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * stipend of £300 (equivalent to $21,000 in 2018) - A$?
 * Dollars replaced the pounds in 1966. Should update the index... Aarghh the ABS have not updated it since 2018. Will send them an email. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * stipend of £300 (equivalent to $21,000 in 2018) - 2021 like most (there's a 2022 below which I've commented on) others?
 * met him at Kings Cross Station. - apos King's
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * where his high school headmaster, A. G. Girdlestone, had gone - this is (Canon) Henry Girdlestone - was at Magdalen College, was headmaster at St Peter's College, Adelaide 1894-1915. When I see Williams on gbooks, it only shows me 3 snippets... page 4 says A.G. Girdlestone, page 6 has Canon Girdlestone and, on page 398 (index?), it has Gibson, A. G. and then Girdlestone, A. G. - Maybe the A. G. got transposed? Macfarlane has Canon. Should swap A. G. to Canon piped to Henry?
 * You can read Williams' whole book at . Appears only on pp. 4, 6 and 398 (which is indeed the index). Macfarline uses "Canon Girdlestone" on pp. 36, 41 and 76. Going with Henry Girdlestone.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * He enrolled in the honour school of physiology,[32] which he studied - where he studied?
 * Um, sure. Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * He became a demonstrator in - link Academic ranks in the United Kingdom or Demonstration (teaching)?
 * Linked to the former. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * awarded the degrees of Bachelor of Arts in 1924 - "degrees" plural? should include B.Sc.? ADB has both for 1924 but then MA for 1935 (but is it a typo and should be 1925?)
 * It's in error. Deleted the "s". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1924 Oxford University Arctic Expedition - section link List of Arctic expeditions?
 * Sure. Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

University of Cambridge
 * although the salary of ₤900 - this is only use of double barred pound sign. intentional?
 * It's a lira sign. Easier to find in the special characters. Changed to a pound sign. The lira is gone now, and the pound ought to be. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * spent the summer with Pol Bouin at the - introduce and link him
 * Introduced an linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * where he studied mucinogen - "he" is Bouin or Florey?
 * Florey. Bouin was the expert on the subject. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * He mastered lysozyme assay - link assay
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

University of Sheffield
 * Joseph Hunter chair of pathology at the University of Sheffield, and - refine or pipe link to Sheffield Medical School? or link at * just below
 * See below. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The faculty board decided to take a chance of Florey, - on Florey?
 * Ooops. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * the retirement of John Beresford Leathes and Edward Mellanby leaving - comma after Leathes
 * Fine without one. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The medical school was small - * see above
 * Linked here.
 * The lack of a first rate pathologist - hyphen? first-rate
 * No idea. Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:29, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

University of Oxford
 * Rhodes Scholars like Australian - such as
 * Um, sure. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Australian Brian Magraith - why drop e from Maegraith x3, intentional?
 * Error. Corrected x 3. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Gordon Sanders - Arthur Gordon Sanders?
 * Macfarlane calls him Gordon and he knew him personally. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * but when Florey approached Pirie's boss, Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins, Hopkins refused - tweak to avoid "Hopkins, Hopkins" Perhaps 'but when Florey approached Sir Frederick Gowland Hopkins, Pirie's boss, Hopkins refused'
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * recommending Ernst Boris Chain. Chain was one of many Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany who had found sanctuary in the UK, and he had recently completed - same thing? "Chain. Chain" maybe 'recommending Ernst Boris Chain. One of many Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany who had found sanctuary in the UK, Chain had found...'
 * Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * the SS Orsova to Melbourne - page has move to SS Orsova (1908). (I know, not broken, just mentioning:)
 * Altered link. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * MacCullum introduced Florey - typo MacCallum
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * arranged for Wright to come to Oxford - add physiologist? why, to visit, advise on something or work?
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The family returned to Oxford in October, and Bertha died on 27 November. - read better if 'Oxford in October; Bertha died '?
 * Split sentence. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Rockefeller Foundation for assistance, and was provided with US$1,250 - the then pound equiv would be helpful here?
 * Added "about £320". Don't know if this is helpful or not. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Penicillin Development
 * work on lysozyme, Chain read papers on lysozyme in - instead of repeating lysozyme, could be 'read papers on the enzyme'
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * personal research assistant. [95][96] - remove space
 * Removed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * liquid Czapek-Dox medium. - dash instead of hyphen?
 * Hyphen is correct. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The pH was lowered by the addition of phosphoric acid and cooled - that reads like the pH was cooled. 'and the liquid was cooled'?
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Initially ether was used - that link is to a class of compounds. Should be piped to Diethyl ether or some other?
 * Diethyl ether
 * much less dangerous amyl nitrite - much less volatiley dangerous?
 * Changed to "flammable". Also it should have been amyl acetate, not nitrate. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * streptococci, staphylococci,- fix italics markup ie separate for each
 * Italicised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Florey reminded his staff that promising as their results were - as promising as?
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * facial infection involving streptococci and staphylococci. His whole - those unitalicised look odd compared to same words italicised in previous para. Nothing to suggest
 * Italicised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * He would spend the next two years - he spent
 * Um, okay. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

North American supply
 * In April 1941, Warren Weaver met with - introduce him?
 * The man with the money. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Chain, who saw penicillin as a joint project between himself and Florey and Heatley as a laboratory technician - Chain felt Heatley equal or is that 'joint project between himself and Florey with Heatley as a laboratory technician'?
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * reunited with the children - his children
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * and Sir Henry Dale, but they - introduce him? ie in what capacity did Florey seek Dale's opinion?
 * Mainly as an éminence grise. Added a bit about him. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * adamantly opposed, as they considered - is that comma necessary?
 * Yes. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Clinical trials
 * gallons (910 L) on 11 September 1942. - year not necessary?
 * Deleted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * rather than the most suitable, - can you clarify most suitable?
 * Not really. Added "for treatment"
 * Harry Lambert, a friend of Fleming's dying from a meningococcal infection became the twelfth case on 5 August 1942. - needs a comma after "infection"?
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * St. Mary's Hospital - link St Mary's Hospital, London?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

North Africa
 * hospital ship HMHS Newfoundland in May. - add year for new section
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * St Hugh's Military Hospital - link St Hugh's College, Oxford
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 40 million units of penicillin - clarify unit?
 * Oh. Added to the earlier part of the article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * been inviting gas gangrene, but - link gas gangrene
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Soviet Union
 * gave him a sample of Gramicidin S. - a sample of the antibiotic Gramicidin S.
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Australia
 * but did not reach Australia until August 1944 - that's not a long time? and arrived in Australia
 * Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * He was accorded a hero's welcome.[146][147][148] and was - remove full stop
 * Replaced full stop with comma Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It ended with Blamey convinced that Florey - Did Florey actually suggest and convince? or just Blamey's idea? did he discuss with Florey?
 * Blamey's pet project. Ginger Burston was involved. After seeing the effects of antibiotics and antimalarials, Blamey became convinced that medical knowledge would be an important factor in future conflicts, and Australia needed its own medical research institute. I don't know why he wanted it to be in Canberra, but that is part of his original proposal.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * research institute in Canberra, - the capital Canberra
 * Sigh. Oh very well. Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It was quickly approved, but Curtin became ill, and he died in July 1945 - remove he? Why "but", did that put kibosh on the approved proposal? Approved as in Curtin had only verbally agreed or was some paperwork, legislation, budget, etc "approved"
 * More on that later. "he" is needed because without it we don't have the comma, and without it there is an ambiguity. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Recognition
 * He was created a Knight Bachelor on 18 July 1944 - while it came from Whitehall on 18 July, it was conferred on the 4th? ie per Gazette "The KING was pleased on Tuesday, the 4th instant, at Buckingham Palace, to confer the honour of Knighthood...
 * Oh wow. Updated the article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * in 1945 with Ernst Boris Chain and Alexander Fleming,[159] - full stop
 * Changed comma to full stop. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * W. Maxwell Cowan observed that: - intro?
 * Added "neuroscientist" Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Lord Nuffield offered - philanthropist?
 * Added ""the philanthropist"

Later life
 * but Guy Newton joined the team - link
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * cephalosporin C from from a fungus originally - remove a from
 * Deleted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Australian National University
 * 19-page proposal for a medical research institute - as part of the planned uni, or its main purpose?
 * As part of the proposed university. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sir David Rivett, who chaired a committee exploring the proposal - the original uni or Florey's? If Florey's, maybe 'who chaired a committee to explore the proposal'
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * H. C. "Nugget" Coombs met - introduce? public servant, economist?
 * Both. He later succeeded Florey as chncellor of the ANU. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * pounds here are £A not same as sterling as mentioned eg at Oxford etc. Why eg "£100,000 (equivalent to £4,591,000 in 2021)" - not to current dollars?
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This was not the end of his association - swap "his" to Florey's
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

President of the Royal Society
 * Florey was elected a member in 1941 - fellow?
 * Yes. Changed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * the president of the Royal Society served for five years, and alternated between - the position/presidency alternated
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Florey became the President of the Royal Society - link List of presidents of the Royal Society?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * offices in attic and basement - the attic
 * Added missing article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * required to realise Sir William Holford's vision - the architect Sir
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Florey's term of office, but the new building - why "but"?
 * Replaced with semicolon. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Provost of Queens College, Oxford
 * this subheading - add apos Queen's
 * Added apostrophe. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * which was demolished - soon/later demolished and a new school
 * Added "later". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * had been critical.,[198] he could stay until 1971 - something happened in here?
 * Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Based on his own experience as a Rhodes scholar, Florey - cap Scholar
 * Capitalised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Buildings were also named after him - after Florey
 * A dubious honour. The building is hideous. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Personal life
 * friend from the Cambridge days arranged for $5,000 - US$?
 * Yes. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * $5,000 (equivalent to $45,000 in 2022) - 2021 like others?
 * No. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * rooms at Queens College and - apostrophe Queen's
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Honours and awards
 * "elected to both the United States National Academy of Sciences" and "a Foreign Associate of the American National Academy of Sciences in 1963" - these are two separate things in 1963?
 * Removed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Death
 * home at the provost's lodging - lodgings plural elsewhere
 * outspoken in his disbelief - nonbelief? "Florey was an agnostic" I can't see the refs but I can see the Williams quote provided ie "he was not aggressive in his disbelief." but then there's "Florey had been so outspoken in his disbelief"? Contradictory? Wouldn't someone "aggressive in his disbelief" be atheist not an agnostic?
 * "The screen is the work of Grinling Gibbons. As an agnostic, the chapel services meant nothing to Florey but, unlike some contemporary scientists, he was not aggressive in his disbelief."


 * "A plaque in his honor is embedded in the wall by the door entering the Anglican church in Old Marston, across the street from the house he and Ethel built. The vestry refused to install it inside because Florey was so outspoken in his disbelief."


 * I'm going with Lax. (I recall what was said of Dirac: "There is no God, and Dirac is His prophet.") Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Posthumous honours and legacy
 * ($50 What a shame the image of the pineapple had to go!) "The note depicted the Sir William Dunn..." - also depicted
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * growth on a Petri dish - this is the only mention of a Petri dish, link?
 * Linked. Never knew who it was named after before. we used to make them. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Florey Building in Oxford is posthumous and the renaming of the original John Curtin School of Medical Research building?
 * The JCSMR moved to the new building in 2009, and the old one was renamed the Florey Building in 2015. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

In film
 * Film Finance Corporation - link Film Finance Corporation Australia
 * linked
 * Film Victoria - link
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Dunn School of Pathology - this is only place where William not used
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Denis Lawson - as Fleming
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oliver Dimsdale - as Chain
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * maybe add (or replace) this which details all the cast and who they played (and isn't snarky lke the Guardian piece!)
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * penicillin in the 1930s and '40s, - remove apostrophe
 * Removed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

images
 * image Corn steep - pipe link Corn steep liquor
 * linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * image John Eccles, Adrien Albert, Frank Fenner and Hugh Ennor study the plans for the John Curtin School of Medical Research - full stop?
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

add cats?
 * Category:Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Category:Australian Fellows of the Royal College of Surgeons (or doesn't include Honorary?)
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Notes
 * note 71 George Dreyer - that's an obituary for George s ?
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * note 219 Abraham 1971, pp. 282. - p or page no/s missing?
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Misc
 * Rockefeller Foundation is linked twice in body but far apart so not a problem? (Rhodes scholar and Penicillin/Development sections)
 * Unlinked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ditto Alfred Newton Richards (sections Rhodes scholar and North American supply)
 * Unlinked Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * v - which is correct, space or not?
 * Ah, you have been reading XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) "Include a space before the trailing / and > of empty elements". This was superseded by a new standard in 2018. Added anyway.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't been reading w3! I see editors add the spaces and other editors remove them. I've never known which is correct. Now I do, so thanks! JennyOz (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

That's my lot. Let me know if any of my comments are confusing. Thanks, JennyOz (talk) 16:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:38, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Jenny ? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for tweaks and patient explanations. I have just made a few minor changes, hope OK.
 * In ANU section there are still two figures in "modern" pounds rather than A$, ie £100,000 (equivalent to £4,591,000 in 2021) and £240,000 (equivalent to £11,019,000 in 2021). Not sure if you missed them?
 * This is a sterling article! (I just hope, for your sake that Mr Nolan doesn't make a new movie about Florey - you deserve a medal for coping with the hundreds of "you've seen the movie, now play with all the related articles" consequences!)
 * Very happy to add my s'port. Thanks again... and ping . JennyOz (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Gog the Mild (talk) 13:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)