Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/I Need You (Paris Hilton song)/archive1

I Need You (Paris Hilton song)

 * Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Did you know that Paris Hilton released a doo-wop song as a Valentine's Day present for her fiancé Chris Zylka? Its lyrics are filled with holiday-related puns, such as “merry in your Christmas”, “the bunny in your Easter”, and “your forever Valentine”. The music video features Hilton wearing lingerie, posing in a bed covered with red rose petals, and popping out of a cake among other activities. This song is so unapologetically and unironically corny that I can't help but love it.

I created this article in 2018 and it received a helpful GAN review from. I recently opened a peer review and I received a lot of great feedback from, , , , , and. Thank you in advance for any comments. I hope everyone is doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

FrB.TG

 * Support per my peer review. FrB.TG (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the support and your help in the peer review. Aoba47 (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Support from TheSandDoctor

 * Support per my peer review. Best of luck! :) -- The SandDoctor Talk 15:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I appreciate it! Aoba47 (talk) 15:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Media review
I'll take this ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍  ‍ 💬 "What did I tell you?" 📝 "Don't get complacent..." 15:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * ALT texts are there, which is good. Most are satisfactory, though can the ALT for the cover art be trimmed? I find it shares more detail than necessary.
 * The ALT text for the infobox image has been trimmed down per your suggestion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * File:INeedYouSingleCover.png
 * single cover arts usually pass NFCC; this one is no different.
 * For posterity, the source link could use an archived version
 * Archived. Aoba47 (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * File:Paris Hilton at the US Capitol (cropped).jpg
 * licensing is a-ok. Derived from a photo taken for a US Congress representative, so this is PD.
 * However, this is causing MOS:IMAGELOC issues on my screen, pushing the "Music and lyrics" header to the right. Can we shrink this using |upright=?
 * Revised. I decreased the size of the image per your suggestion, and I also shortened the image caption to hopefully help with this matter further. Aoba47 (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

📝 "Don't get complacent..." 17:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * File:AmericanBeautyParisHiltonScreenShot.jpg
 * I skimmed the section in which this image is placed. The detail shown in the music video screenshot is covered substantially in the prose, passing NFCC #8. It also passes NFCC #1 since one can't make a free alternative image to this screenshot, and readers cannot discern what "classic Americana" aesthetic looks through words alone.
 * I'd fill out the Replaceability_text parameter and say why text alone cannot substitute the picture, which I outlined above.
 * Thank you for the suggestion. It is best to be more specific with these rationales as it is encouraged to keep non-free media usage to a minimum (which is understandable). Aoba47 (talk) 16:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Ditto with the single cover; I'd archive the Instagram link and include the archived version in the NFC rationale
 * There was already information for the single cover's replaceability, which was used from other FAs on songs, and I am not sure if anything further could be added, but I am open to suggestions. I have archived the Instagram link. To be completely transparent though, it is not the most helpful since the image is not showing up in the archive, but that could be an Instagram issue. Aoba47 (talk) 16:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and added a different archive link that actually displays the picture, so don't worry ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍  ‍ 💬 "What did I tell you?"

📝 "Don't get complacent..." 17:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 📝 "Don't get complacent..." 17:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * File:INeedYouParisHiltonAudioSample.ogg
 * Of short enough length (10% of original song's) and low enough quality (50 kbps). The relevant section's prose significantly discusses the details intended to be illustrated by the sample. Hence NFCC #8 is satisfied. It also passes NFCC #1 since a free alternative is impossible, and readers cannot discern how doo-wop and pop sound through words alone.
 * Like with the MV screenshot file page, I'd fill out the Replaceability_text parameter for the sake of completeness
 * Very good point. I have revised this point. Aoba47 (talk) 16:42, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the media review! It is great to get this kind of thing addressed early in a FAC and you have done a wonderful and thorough job as a reviewer. I believe that I have addressed everything, but please let me know if things can be improved further. Thank you again! Aoba47 (talk) 16:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Aoba47, no problem! And I thank you for the prompt responses I went ahead and added captions for the audio sample since I noticed there wasn't one, by the way. Now that that is done and all my concerns are sufficiently addressed, this gets a pass from me ‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍  ‍ 💬 "What did I tell you?"
 * Thank you again! I appreciate that you went the extra mile and added the captions for the audio sample. That was very nice and something that I honestly forgot about completely. Apologies for that. Have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Have a great weekend @Aoba47! I hope to see y'all lovely folks again at FAC soon - some goodies are in the works :) <b style="border-radius:3em;padding:4px;background:#926f52;color:white;">‍ ‍ Your Power 🐍 ‍ </b> ‍ <span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"><sup style="font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">💬 "What did I tell you?"

NØ

 * The cover seems to be 250x250px instead of the usual 300x300. This is totally OK though from a policy POV.
 * Revised as it is best to keep everything consistent. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Do you think "Hilton's fifth appearance on the Dance Club Songs chart, the single peaked at number 31" might be a more climactic way of writing the lead's second paragraph's second sentence?
 * While I understand and appreciate your suggestion, I am not sure about ending a sentence with a number. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * "Hilton posted photos from the music video on her Instagram account" - "Hilton posted photos from the music video on Instagram" might work just as well
 * Very good point. It is better to go with your more concise suggestion. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe it could be indicated somehow that this second album was never released
 * Unfortunately, I could not find third-party, reliable sources that confirm this information. There are articles that pop up every now and then about Hilton promising new music, but that's the tough thing with non-releases like this. They hardly ever get confirmation in the press. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * "Dresden described the song as "over-the-top syrupy and smothering" - "over-the-top" sounds a bit critical to me so does this maybe belong in Reception rather than Music and lyrics?
 * Understandable. I have revised this bit and moved it down to the "Reception" section. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Does it need to be mentioned the video was released on her "official" YouTube account? It would be rather unusual if they released it on an unofficial channel.
 * Agreed. It would be assumed the channel is official unless stated otherwise. Aoba47 (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Would it be possible to be more specific while describing "Stash Konig, Dirty Disco and Nitemover" than just "artists"? Maybe their country, or if they are DJs or producers could be included.
 * I have included that they are all DJs, with an appropriate wikilink, but I am uncertain about their country. I would imagine that they are from different areas so that may be overly cumbersome to list here. Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Is it necessary to include that one of the remixes was released through Facebook? If no secondary source covered this and the Facebook upload is the only source maybe this isn't very noteworthy.
 * Fair point. I was initially reluctant to cut this sentence, but the platforms that the remixes were released on is trivial and since it was nothing noteworthy (i.e. neither the SoundCloud or FaceBook releases received attention in secondary sources), I cut the whole thing. Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Nothing else I can see of concern. Hope you are having a great week!--<b style="color:purple">N</b><b style="color:teal">Ø</b> 15:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review! I greatly appreciate your help and I hope you are having a great weekend so far! Aoba47 (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the replies. Happy to support this FAC on prose.--<b style="color:purple">N</b><b style="color:teal">Ø</b> 18:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review and the support! Aoba47 (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Pseud 14

 * Support on prose, per my peer review. --Pseud 14 (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by Z1720
Non-expert prose review.


 * "Through the track, Hilton sings about love and how she will" -> "The lyrics describe how Hilton is in love and how she will..." To emphasise that this paragraph is about the lyrics.
 * The next sentence already starts with "The lyrics ... " so it would make the prose repetitive. I am not sure if the change is beneficial since the transition from the production to the lyrics is already quite clear (at least in my opinion). Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * "Michael Love Michael viewed the track", "Raisa Bruner cited "I Need You"", since these people don't have wikipages, their credentials (stating that they are critics, or which publication they are writing for) should be included in the article.
 * Both critics were already introduced in a previous section where the publication was attributed in the prose. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You are correct, so reintroducing them is unnecessary. Perhaps their first names can be removed after their first mention? Z1720 (talk) 00:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I thought it would be helpful to include their full names since this is a new section and it may confuse some readers to just see a last name. Aoba47 (talk) 01:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * In the lede, Hilton is described as a socialite, but this is not cited in the article body.
 * I do not believe this is necessary. I have not seen similar things in other featured articles about songs (i.e. having the descriptor backed up by a citation) and the primary Paris Hilton article already make this descriptor quite clear. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not typically ask editors go to other articles to verify information. While a citation would not be needed to say someone is a singer in a song article (the fact that a person released a song is enough to verify that they are a singer is verified because they sang the song, so it doesn't need to be explicitly stated), the fact that someone is a socialite is not inherently implied by the release of a song. It doesn't need to be cited in the lede, but I would imagine that it would be mentioned in the body with a citation. Since I am not very familiar with song/music articles, I will leave that to your discretion on whether it should be added and won't let this affect my support, because at the end of the day this is relatively minor. Z1720 (talk) 00:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * How would you introduce and cite this information in the article? I cannot think of a way that would not come across as awkward? Aoba47 (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The best way I can think of to do so is in the first sentence of "Recording and release" to say, "American socialite Paris Hilton co-wrote "I Need You" with its producer Michael Green..." Again, I am not very familiar with song articles, so if this seems awkward then I do not recommend putting it in the article unless another reviewer also flags this. Z1720 (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * That would not work in my opinion. Look at featured articles on songs, such as "I'm Goin' Down", "Dear Future Husband", and "Sound and Vision", and none of them use a descriptive phrase for the primary artist. I thought about including a sentence or two in the "Recording and release" section about how Hilton is a socialite who first pursued a music career by an album in 2006, but it seemed odd to include this for something outside her first musical release and it came across like padding to me.
 * For clarification, I am also hesitant to change the lede to say "American singer Paris Hilton" because Hilton is more commonly associated with other aspects of her career outside of music. I am just not sure how to best approach this to accommodate your suggestion. Apologies. Aoba47 (talk) 01:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Just so you are aware, I have added a brief paragraph to the beginning of the article about how Hilton was a socialite who pursued a music career. I hope that is helpful. Thank you for your review and support. Aoba47 (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think this addition resolves this concern. Z1720 (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Lede says, "The single peaked at number 31 on the Dance Club Songs chart," While body says "peaked at number 32 on the Dance Club Songs Billboard chart."
 * Thank you for catching this. It should be 32 so I have changed the lede. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Those are my thoughts. Please ping when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. I believe that I have addressed everything. Let me know if anything could be done to further improve the article. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support I left some notes above for the nominator's consideration, but it won't affect my support. Z1720 (talk) 00:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Source review

 * WP:QWQ issue in source 3 and 31d.
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * En-dash should be used instead of hyphen in source 5, 28 and 31. You can use this script to do the work for you.
 * Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies for my mistake with this one and thank you for the correction. Aoba47 (talk) 22:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Spot-checks: source 3, 4, 11 (in PR), 14, 15, 16, 20. No issues (just one extremely small point noted below).
 * Thank you for checking through these citations. Spot-checks are always important. Aoba47 (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Source 14 and 15: article quotes "breathy vocals" based on these two sources but one of them only uses "vocal" without the s. FrB.TG (talk) 19:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I have revised this point. Thank you for catching this as I would not want to misrepresent a citation even by accident. I believe that I have addressed everything, but please let me know if there's anything else I can do to improve the article further. Have a great rest of your day! Aoba47 (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. Consider it a pass from me. FrB.TG (talk) 21:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the source review! Aoba47 (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments from ChrisTheDude
I PRed this article and, although there have been some minor changes since then, there's nothing to pick up on so I am happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 21:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments from VersaceSpace

 * Clear and comprehensive. Well-written and contains good media. My only complaint is that the amount of prose in the image caption has caused there to be a large amount of empty space. Still, very good. — VersaceSpace  🌃 21:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not get empty space in the article in my view, but I have attempted to trim the caption for the music video screenshot (which is what I am guessing you are referring to) to hopefully avoid that as much as possible for other readers. Aoba47 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments from Ippantekina

 * I think it's helpful to add a brief introduction of Heiress Records i.e. it was created by Hilton herself
 * I have added a bit to the "Background and release" section about this. Aoba47 (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * "Hilton's decision to experiment with a different musical genre" I believe it's helpful to discuss briefly what styles she did before to see how "different" this song is
 * I have hopefully cleared this up in the lede, and I have heavily revised the second paragraph in the "Reception" section to make these connection clearer in the prose. Feel free to let me know if these areas could use further revision. I will be looking at them again later when I have some distance. Aoba47 (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * I think there is a curly apostrophe in the "Music and lyrics" section
 * Could you please be more specific? I am not seeing it, but I am not the best at this one. Aoba47 (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Link Americana
 * Linked. Aoba47 (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Do we have credits from a more "official" source, like the digital booklet or Tidal?
 * Unfortunately, we do not. There is not a digital booklet for this single, and Tidal does not provide any credits for this song. Aoba47 (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The rest of the article is well written and comprehensively researched. Nicely done! Ippantekina (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. You have helped to improve the article a lot, specifically the point about the different musical genres. I have addressed everything, but the curly apostrophe. I cannot see in that section, but I am more likely than not reading over it. Apologies for that. I hope you are having a great weekend so far! Aoba47 (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Though it is nitpick-y, I have went on with fixing the apostrophe myself. Thank you for addressing everything else, and I support this article for promotion on prose. Ippantekina (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the support and fixing the apostrophe. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being nitpick-y as the article should meet all the requirements. I am not sure how/why I kept overlooking that one so thank you for catching it. Aoba47 (talk) 15:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Status update

 * Apologies for the ping. I just wanted a status update for this nomination as it has been two weeks and it has received a good deal of attention from reviewers already. Thank you for your time and apologies again for being impatient. I hope everyone is having a good weekend so far! Aoba47 (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)