Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/John F. Kennedy/archive1

John F. Kennedy
This is a good quality article that I think should be a FA. It went through a peer review back in July (there wasn't much of a response, unfortunately) and I believe the issues raised have been addressed. As to my participation in this article, I have made some minor edits, nothing substantial as far as I can remember, mostly copyedits. Akamad 12:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Object for now. I'm concerned with the level of unattributed opinion in the article. A quick scan read throws up "some people", "some sources", "some claimed", "some critics", "critics, some of whom", "many other critics", "leading many to deem", "many who listened", "many military officials" and "many civil rights leaders". Who are these people? Filiocht | The kettle's on 13:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Object:
 * There are entirely too many one- and two-sentence paragraphs, which really chops up the prose and doesn't allow for a good flow to the article.
 * I'd like to see some better organization to the article; for example, under "Early political career" there are details about Kennedy's marriage and stillborn child. These have nothing to do with his political career, so I'd recommend creating a specific section dedicated to his personal life. (You could probably put it under "Image, social life and family" but I think that deserves a full section and not just a subsection.)
 * At points, the article reads like a "list in prose". It's not a list per se, but it seems to be little more than an annotated timeline at times.  (In 1950, this happened.  In 1952, this happened.  Then in 1953, this happened. ...and so forth)
 * Good luck! Pack n Canes  |   say something!   17:31, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Object:
 * Very unevenly written. Some paragraphs are excellent, but between them are one sentence paragraphs that often seem out of place. For example, "Years later, it would be revealed that Kennedy had been diagnosed as a young man with Addison's Disease, a rare endocrine disorder. This and other medical disorders were kept from the press and the public throughout Kennedy's life." is the second paragraph of early life. Not only does it not fit, it is hardly important in the overall role his childhood played in his becoming president and the greater influence that had on US and world politics.Dtaw2001 19:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Object:
 * The images Image:JFKPT109.jpg, Image:JFKSENATE.jpg, Image:Jfknixon.jpg, Image:Jfkspeech.jpg, Image:JFKNASA.jpg, Image:KennedyCabinet.jpg, Image:2005 proof Kennedy half dollar.png have no source information.
 * The image Image:Jfkatbcin56.jpg has no source or copyright information.
 * The image Image:JFKMLK.jpg has no source information. "Fair use" cannot be claimed without knowing the source of the image.  Also, there's no reason to use a non-free image here.
 * The image Image:Kennedy bros.jpg is tagged as "fair use", but it appears to be for decorative purposes only. This isn't allowed under Fair use.
 * The image Image:JFKCasketLeavesCapitolHill.JPG is claimed as "fair use", but I'm sure there's a public-domain replacement somewhere.
 * The image Image:Democratslogo.png, used in the template USDemPresNominees, is tagged as "fair use". Non-free images are not permitted in templates.
 * The image Image:JFKmotorcade.jpg is tagged as "fair use", but has no source information. It also has what appears to be a copyright statement dating from 1992 in the lower-left corner.  If at all possible, this image needs to be replaced with a free image; if not, source information and a fair-use rationale need to be supplied.
 * --Carnildo 23:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Object, although it's nicely structured with a lot of good material. I'm not an expert in US history or culture, as you will be able to tell from my comments.  (a) Almost all of the links in the See also section should be included in the main text of the article (in fact after looking more closely, I notice some of them already are).  (b) While I don't necessarily disagree with the assessment, could the statement that the Cuban Missile Crisis "brought the world closer to nuclear war than at any point before or since" be argued rather than asserted?  This assertion is even stronger than the assertion in the Cuban Missile Crisis article, which is itself not backed up by direct evidence.  (c) "Patsy" is US slang, and not in common usage elsewhere afaik (I had to look it up, anyway :-) - can this be reworded?  (d) What exactly does the phrase "he was the last Democrat from the North" mean?  (e) The intro states the assassination is often considered a defining moment in American history both because of its traumatic impact on the entire nation, and because of Kennedy's elevation as an icon for a new generation of Americans and American aspirations.  However this is not discussed in the article, even in the section "Assassination and aftermath", and there is no mention anywhere of the impact of Kennedy's assassination (if any) on the rest of the world.  --RobertG &#9836; talk 10:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)