Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/John III of Portugal/archive3

John III of Portugal
Partial self-nom. After the Biography Collaboration I think it is now a fine article. Underwent countless improvements on language issues, image problems and the content itself. Gameiro 00:13, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, well-referenced, fine lead and apparently complete (can't vouch for accuracy). Minor issue: Under Inquisition Pope links to the current one. Could someone find out who was Pope at the time. The text isn't very clear whether the Inquisitor was appointed in 1515, 1536 or a completely different year. - Mgm|(talk) 09:39, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Kudos to the collaborators, but this still needs some work. It seems to be missing a fairly large section. The article goes straight from outlining his life to discussing the declining state of Portugal during the later part of his reign. Where is the description of the nation's condition during the early part of his reign? The writing also needs improvement. Trade is not generally described as being "intense" and scholarships are not generally "attributed." The article also has some formatting problems. There are far too many one sentence paragraphs, and the images are poorly arranged. The article fails to use the standard footnote style for the quotations and other in text references. - SimonP 17:53, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * FA's use different reference styles I don't see anything wrong with current system.
 * There is a section John_III_of_Portugal, I think this can be solved with just a bit rearranging of existing sections. - Mgm|(talk) 18:49, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral I will support if SimonP's objections are met. This should probably be archived  as a FAiled FAC considering its been a month. I hope to see this one up again.  I don't think there is anytrhing wrong with the images or references though. Falphin 15:30, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support with minor issue. It would be nice to see the lead be organized into three summary paragraphs. While it may or may not be complete it is just a bunch of 2 sentence paragraphs which doest not follow Lead. Newbie222 17:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The João III article is a mess. The first thing it needs is for someone to get the Paulo Braga biography and use it for the facts. Get those straight first. Then go on to the other stuff. The statement that the head of the Inquisition always came from the royal family is dead wrong, for example. Where did the writer get that howler?