Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2018.

Kal Ho Naa Ho

 * Nominator(s): —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

This article is about Kal Ho Naa Ho, a 2003 Indian Hindi film starring Jaya Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, Saif Ali Khan and Preity Zinta. The film is known for its story, screenplay, dialogues, performances and music. A special note of thanks to Bollyjeff for reviewing the GAN. This is my sixth FAC attempt and my first at Hindi films. Constructive comments here are most welcome. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Image review from SNUGGUMS
Hopefully this helps. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * File:KalHoNaaHo.jpg has an appropriate FUR
 * No issues with File:Jaya Bachchan still16.jpg, File:Shah Rukh Khan 2001.jpg, or File:Saif at 2014 Stardust.jpg
 * The file source for File:Preity Zinta cropped.jpg isn't working, so you'll have to remove this if you can't fix or replace that URL
 * UPDATE: The URL for that last image has now been fixed, so all media use is now A-OK. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, . Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * My pleasure :) Snuggums (talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 11:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Withdrawal of nomination Placing the nomination ON HOLD
I wish to place the nomination of this article on hold for 2-3 weeks due to personal matters (A close relation of mine has died). As a result, I'm not in a state of mind to continue. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 03:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for your loss Ssven. But I think putting this on hold would be a better idea since FACs usually go for weeks without much progress. -- <b style="color: black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  03:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright then. I shall place it on hold. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 04:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * My condolences Ssven. I think you had the right idea with withdrawal -- we don't really have an "on hold" concept in FAC; yes, noms can go for some time without activity but we should try to avoid that whenever possible. I'd therefore prefer to close this and give you all the time you need before re-nominating. Tks, Ian Rose (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.