Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kiss & Cry (song)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2016.

Kiss & Cry (song)

 * Nominator(s): CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk &middot;&#32;contribs} 04:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

This article is about a song recorded by Japanese–American singer-songwriter Hikaru Utada. This is one of Utada's well known tracks post-Deep River, and I believe the article is well written and well researched. I would like to ask Wikipedia editors and reviewers to give reason of their decisions/opinions so I can improve this article, if it does not get promoted. If there are any inquiries, please ping or post to my page. Thanks, CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk &middot;&#32;contribs} 04:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Update; I had forgotten to link this to the Featured article nomination page. My apologies for this inconvenience. CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk &middot;&#32;contribs} 06:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Done the best I can to improve the article for FA; please notify me by any means if there needs to be any further improvement.
 * Great job with the improvements to the article. While I understand your decision to wait until a further consensus is reached about the Amazon review, I still highly recommend removing it as I have been previously flagged by a user for this during a GA review for an album. The user was very explicit that Amazon reviews should not be used for the review, but I respect your decision to wait and see what other people say about this.
 * I personally do not have a major problem with the source. I believe you had done as comprehensive work on this as you can so I'm now willing support to this FAC. Good luck with getting this promoted! Aoba47 (talk) 04:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Closing comment -- Sorry but this review seems to have stalled so I'll be archiving it shortly. It may be worth putting it through Peer Review, requesting input from relevant projects and any editors you can think of, before looking at any re-nomination here, at which point you can leave neutrally worded notices with any who have commented along the way that the article is back at FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.