Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Larrys Creek

Larrys Creek
Larrys Creek has been rated as a Good Article and has had a peer review (which is archived here). The peer review found no major problems and the suggestions for improvement have all been addressed. The article follows most of the recommendations of WikiProject Rivers ( although there is no list of tributaries, as the major ones are given in the article ).

This is a self-nomination in that I have made most of the edits to the article, but I have sought feedback from many and have received positive comments. Larrys Creek is a relatively small, but quite interesting stream and I believe the article does it justice. Thanks for any feedback, Ruhrfisch 21:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Support nowRlevse 11:06, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Object See if the name section can be expanded. Also, while a few footnotes in the intro are okay, this has too many-it's distracting. Since the intro is supposed to be a summary, it can be written so no notes are required in it. Work on this and I'll look at again. You may want to consider adding something on its pollution history/status too. Good start, though.Rlevse 21:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Response Thanks for the helpful critique. Per your comments, I have expanded the name section, removed all footnotes from the lead section (and I believe corrected all errors resulting from cutting and pasting the references), and made a new subsection on "Water quality and pollution" incorporating some material already in the article and adding one reference. I also added the list of tributaries recommended by the Rivers WikiProject. Thanks again, Ruhrfisch 02:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. although I would like to see the color in the tributary map changed. The color for Larrys Creek is described as orange but appears quite brown, especially in the small size image displayed inline. Rmhermen 18:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Color adjusted slightly. Kmusser 18:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment and thanks for fixing the color. I think the fact that it is orange with a blue line through it makes it look muddier / browner, especially on a small scale. Ruhrfisch 18:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. 33 pin-citations.  Plenty of pictures, ALL either PD or GNU-FDL.  Belongs on the Wiki 1.0 CD, too. --M @ r ē ino 18:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support I found the article well-written and informative. --evrik 19:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support One of the best stream/river articles I've seen, amazing! Pfly 16:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Note: I have a small conflict of interest in that I supplied information for the "paper railroads" section. Regardless, this is a stunningly comprehensive and well-referenced article and deserves wider attention. Choess 05:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Great work. Kmusser 06:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, ditto-ing what others have said. Perhaps a hair over-wikified, but nothing too problematic. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 00:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Support -- comprehensive, interesting, and informative. Do you have a source for more information about the covered bridge?  Since it's on the National Register of Historic Places, I think we should have an article on it.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 19:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Response I have four sources of information about the bridge, three are cited. The best is "" which gives almost everything but the rehabilitation and National Register Information. It has much more information about the bridge, details of construction, etc. The online Covered Bridges page gives the basic data and rehab date: "". The third source is a photo I took of the plaque the Lycoming County Commissioners erected when the bridge was rehabbed - it is the source for the National Register (and the photo is not on Wikipedia or explicitly cited). Here is a link to a list of Lycoming County NRHP sites, it is listed under "Cogan House Covered Bridge": . The fourth source is Meginness (article ref #1), who mentions the bridge and it surviving the 1889 flood (which also wiped out Johnstown, PA - should I mention that in the article?). I would have to go back to a library that has the issue of "Now and Then" to get more details, but I could write a brief article on the bridge (I have other pictures of the bridge too - they would be GFDL). I am fairly busy now, so it could take a while. Ruhrfisch 21:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)