Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 16:32, 1 June 2008.

Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York
I hereby christen this article a featured article (candidate). It showcases brilliant writing legal and is sourced, good format, images, etc. JeanLatore (talk) 00:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose
 * Completely uncited, I can't see one citation.
 * Lead does not meet WP:LEAD
 * No references whatsoever.
 * Please consider re-reading the featured article criteria once more. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  00:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose per Milk's Favorite Cookie. Your perennial nomination of articles that do not meet the FA criteria is getting annoying. Please familiarize yourself with the FA criteria before nominating in the future. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Previous noms by JeanLatore:
 * 1) Featured_article_candidates/Beavis_and_Butt-head/archive1 and talk page note.
 * 2) Featured article candidates/Strap-on dildo/archive1 and talk page note.

I am traveling and on a bad connection; will leave the talk page notes to others. See also: User:SandyGeorgia/Glitter Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 01:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment on Sandy Georgia. see her unhelpful commentary at my talk page referenced to my queries her talk page.  Folks, I think we've been had! JeanLatore (talk) 15:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose No references? Gary King ( talk ) 06:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Oppose Premature FAC nom. One online source is provided, but nothing else and no footnotes. Please withdraw it, JeanLatore. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 11:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose No in-line citations, one primary source, clearly not even B class.--Grahame (talk) 13:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Support It's a Supreme Court case, and those are very informative. Angie Y. (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose of course. I'm finding it difficult to assume good faith. The nominator has been extremely rude to User:SandyGeorgia on her Talk page and this is the third completely unprepared article nominated by this person, despite the clear explanations of the process that have been offered. Please withdraw the nomination and follow the peer-review and Good Article route. Graham Colm Talk 17:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok fair enough, someone plz. help me do a "peer review" of this article ASAP. JeanLatore (talk) 22:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.