Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Louis Riel

Louis Riel
An interesting and comprehensive article on one of Canada's most enigmatic historical figures. Denni &#9775; 01:09, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
 * Support. Great. Phils 12:50, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent work; among the best Wikipedia articles on historical figures.  (Disclaimer: I know little about Riel from other sources besides the Chester Brown comic, so I'm not the best judge of comprehensiveness or slant, but this looks really good to me.)  I wish the article on John Brown were this good! -- Rbellin|Talk 16:45, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: A prior featured article nomination result for this article is here. -- Rbellin|Talk 16:51, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, it was not defeated in the previous FAC cycle, rather withdrawn to Peer Review. It has in fact undergone almost a complete rewrite in PR. Fawcett5 18:19, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Support. Reviewers might choose to take this with a grain of salt &mdash; I here disclose that I did much of the rewrite after it went back to peer review following the last FAC attempt (with able assistance from JamesTeterenko and CWood among others). Fawcett5 18:19, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * seems like a great article, but object that the references section is short and it isn't at all obvious which parts of the text to look up in which reference. Also, I notice that some phrases "Riel was the eldest of eleven children in a tight-knit, highly religious and well respected French Canadian-Métis family." are remarkably similar to the dictionary of Canada article  "Riel was the eldest of 11 children in a close-knit, devoutly religious, and affectionate family"  this seems too close to a copyright violation for a featured article.  Mozzerati 20:38, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
 * My response:
 * Number of References - the reference section includes 5 of the most important standard works on Riel, including Riel's own writings, Boulton's first person account from 1886, Stanley's 1963 classic, Siggin's respected 1994 update, and Flanagan's 1992 work suggesting the parallels between Riel's following and Millenarianism. For those less academically inclined, there is even a graphic novel.  The bases are covered. The external links also have two more quality biographies.
 * almost withdrawn - I've copied your descriptions into the article, can you just verify, and as needed correct or expand my text as needed.Mozzerati
 * OK, I've made slight copyedits on your changes, and added the ref for the Flanagan bio (hadn't noticed before that the extant ref was just for his pamphlet, not his book). Note also that I didn't mean to imply that Sliggins text was based on Stanley's, just that it was a more modern treatment.Fawcett5 14:16, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Finding what you want - The account sticks closely to a consensus version of Riel's activities - for 99% of the material you can refer to any of the standard texts. Footnotes or inline citations are therefore an unneccesary distraction for the vast majority of the article. There are two exceptions:
 * Direct quotations from Boulton's account, which are attributed to him in the text where they occur.
 * The "Reconsidering Riel" section is where non-consensus theories or interpretations are dealt with. In this section, the relevant historians are mentioned by name.
 * thanks for that answer; I would still prefer if individual quotes had page numbers etc. The reason for this is that people who are once considered good historians can later be re-evaluated (see David Irving who was discovered to be a liar) and any material based on their work has to be carefully checked.  If you give detailed sources then it easier for checking later.  Even so, with the addition of the comments you gave earlier, your article will not nearly be worst within the FAC category, so once you've verified my edit, I withdraw this objection.  Mozzerati 06:41, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
 * Copyright violation - The DCBO biography (actually by Stanley, Riel's best-known biographer) was obviously important source material for both myself and other editors. While the sentence you point out does have similarity, it most assuredly does not rise to the standard of a copyright violation. Nevertheless, I will change this, and any other instances that you can point out - I believe that very few such problems survived the rewrite. Fawcett5 21:24, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I will try to check this further; in the case where the sentence actually was derived from an original source we would have to claim fair use. That would be okay only for a very limited amount of the article.  Mozzerati 06:41, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
 * I have checked this as far as I could (which wasn't much). That sentence was added in a small edit along with other material  which appears to be original.  Since that time the article has been almost entirely changed.  I guess it's okay, probably the original contributor was trying to do their best and isn't fully copyright aware.  I can say that this is a perfect example of where a full system of inline notes would allow much easier checking since we could see exactly which bit to lookup where.  Please everybody be more careful in future.  I consider this last objection answered and am striking out my object. Mozzerati 06:38, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)


 * Support - Covers all of his life in a well-balanced way and fits it all into the surrounding history. Great work! Radagast 02:03, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Just so everyone knows my bias, I have contributed a bit to the article.  I also voted against it becoming a featured article a month ago.  Fawcett5 has done an amazing job rewriting the article, and a few of us tried to help when we can.  -- JamesTeterenko 07:39, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I also was a contributor to the article, so again, a bit of bias.  This article has had an amazing transformation thanks to Fawcett5 and others.  Riel was a complex figure in Canadian history and I think that this article does him justice. CWood 14:57, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I too contributed a bit, and my opinion is much like CWood's. The article now treats Riel as a historical figure; I think that was the intention of the article from the beginning, but when I first ran across it it tended towards hagiography. Riel is, despite what many prefer to think, one of the most important figures in Canadian history, and this article gives you a good idea why he is. John FitzGerald 19:48, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support - an engrossing story of an interesting character - excellently written. Worldtraveller 21:57, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - This couple of sentences from the intro reads just very slightly oddly to me:
 * In 1884, he returned to what is now the province of Saskatchewan in order to represent Métis grievances to the Canadian government. But this resistance, known as the North-West Rebellion of 1885, escalated into a military confrontation.
 * "Representing grievances", which to me suggests a non-confrontational process of consultation, has become "resistance" in the next sentence. It's a very, very minor point, but pedantry is my stock-in-trade. --194.73.130.132 08:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, thats not a bad way to describe what actually happened. Took a few months in real life, rather than one sentence though... Fawcett5 11:22, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak Object - The execution of Scott, if I remember my history correctly, hardened the public attitude in Canada against him. Yet I see no mention in that section, only of legal troubles. Can you clarify further? Burgundavia 21:40, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Burgundavia, this is comprehensively dealt with in the main article on this period of Riel's life. See Red River Rebellion. Much of the material there now was previously at Louis Riel, but was moved to conform with summary style and article length considerations. Fawcett5 23:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)