Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Macintosh Classic


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 03:35, 30 May 2008.

Macintosh Classic
Self-nominator. I re-wrote most of this recently, and initiated a successful peer review and a couple copy-edits. Fully referenced, good prose. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 21:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - The article is really good, and the links checked out fine.  Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 19:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Support, the prose looks great and I have not found any additional issues. -- Laser brain  (talk)  17:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Comment, I don't have much to add because I made my comments at the article peer review.  I think the article could stand one more run-through by a different copyeditor to spit shine it a bit.  -- Laser brain   (talk)  19:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Another copy-editor made some edits, but I think most of them were not beneficial. Are there any particular sentences which stick out? If not, I think this is not actionable. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 09:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The prose is already very good, but I have consulted AnnaFrance to further 'polish' the prose/quality of writing throughout. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 20:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I like. Well done, and leaning to support.  One question though: are any sales figures available for the Macintosh classic? How well did it perform compared to it's predecessor and successor units?  Would be nice to know, if the info is available. Resolute 20:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This was asked at the peer review, and the answer is unfortunately no. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 20:48, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Well, Can't ask for what isn't available then. I like that all major points are discussed in such a compact article. Resolute 21:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - To address Laserbrain's concerns, the article has now been copyedited by two editors, User:AnnaFrance and User:Finetooth in addition to original copyedits by User:Leoniana. — Wackymacs ( talk  ~  edits ) 10:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Comment  - I've done a little copy editing, and please check that I haven't done anything stupid. Graham Colm Talk 11:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC) and Graham Colm Talk 17:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.