Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Multicommunicating/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:52, 18 March 2012.

Multicommunicating

 * Nominator(s): Kommunication (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because it is a well researched, timely and thorough article written for an academic purpose.

Kommunication (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Suggest this article be withdrawn immediately: There are significant issues with prose style, formatting, presentation of sources etc. It would need substantial work to obtain a GA status, let alone FA. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Oppose. Agreed, you're in the wrong place; shoot for GA on this one first. The referencing isn't what's expected for an FA. - Dank (push to talk) 02:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose per both. Whole sections without references - only 12 in the whole article, and most are to 10-20 page stretches. I doubt it would get GA as it stands. Johnbod (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.