Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Osteitis fibrosa cystica/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:31, 6 June 2009.

Osteitis fibrosa cystica

 * Nominator(s): Strombollii (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because having recently received GAN, I feel that the article articulately and professionally explains the subject. The article has undergone four intensive reviews and multiple multi-party edits, and I feel meets all FA criterion.Strombollii (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments: -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The pathophysiology section could be more in depth and involve a diagram of the process.
 * The section on epidemiology touches on the USA and Asia. Any data from the rest of the world?
 * In the history section it is mentioned that the rate has decreased in the western world with better treatment. What was the rate before and what has it decreased to?
 * It seems that there are 4 causes. I would be best if each cause had its own section rather than being numbered.
 * I have seen some gross anatomy images of these tumors as mentioned at the GA. People will often release images if you ask much like radiopedia did for the images of the hands.
 * It discusses x ray findings under signs and symptoms. Should be moved to diagnosis.


 * Comments -
 * What makes http://www.whonamedit.com/synd.cfm/1208.html a reliable source?
 * I guess you removed it? Haha It was a placeholder until I replaced the info.
 * I didn't remove it. It's still there, current ref 39 "Engel..." Ealdgyth - Talk 11:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * ''Removed reference: info substantiated in other two references at the conclusion of that sentence.Strombollii (talk) 01:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * There is a cleanup/expand banner in one section.
 * That was inserted by Doc: I'm trying to find data to change that, but there really isn't anything available as far as I can tell. 
 * Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I saw at least one one-sentence section that should be expanded, and noted several MOS issues in edit summaries. I'm concerned that some physicians should look at this article for 1b, comprehensive, as several sections are short and stubby.   Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - and I hate doing this because the article is from the WikiProject AP Biology 2008 that I was involved in. I have been watching this page hoping for comments from the medics, but they do not seem interested. There are many problems with the article. First, it reads as though the targeted readers are medical professionals, and, although this is often difficult to get round, no effort seems to have been made. The prose, although generally good, fails on occasions. Simple improvements such as quick redundancy checking for "as well as", "also" and more complex redundancy such as "which is a term used to refer to", would be a start. The deeper faults include: In summary, I think the article does not satisfy the FA criteria. Much more work is required, which I doubt can be done in a reasonable time. Graham Colm Talk 17:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Abnormalities affecting the parathyroid glands cause a surplus of PTH, which, in turn, increases the activity and frequency of such cells. - it is far from clear that "such cells" are osteoblasts and osteocytes.
 * Increased PTH triggers the release of stored calcium through the dissolution of old bone, as well as the conservation of said serum calcium through a cessation in the production of new bone. - "as well as" and "of said serum calcium" - need attention, particularly the latter, I do not understand the need for "of said"
 * Muscles in patients afflicted with OFC generally appear unaffected or "bulked up" instead of diminishing in mass. - why would they be expected to diminish in mass?
 * Often the article seems more about hyperparathyroidism than OFC. This is particularly noticable in the History and Epidemiology sections, but occurs throughout the article; If muscular symptoms appear upon the onset of hyperparathyroidism, they are generally sluggish contraction and relaxation of the muscles.
 * What is deviation of the trachea?
 * The section on blood testing is very poor; there is not enough detail. What do the results of the tests mean, how should they be interpreted, what are their normal ranges, when should they be performed, are they reliable? These should all be explained.
 * There is a big difference between a sign and a symptom. The usage is wrong in the Radiology section, which again is not very good. X-rays may also be used to diagnose the disease - no they aid the diagnosis. Only humans diagnose.
 * I respectfully disagree with this point. Humans use x-rays to diagnose the disease. Therefore x-rays are indeed used to diagnose the disease. [Although I accept that re-writing the sentence might be helpful.] Axl  ¤  [Talk]  19:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, brown tumors, especially when manifested on facial bones, can be misdiagnosed as neoplastic. - this sentence is targetted at medics.
 * skull x-rays may depict - skulls do not emit X-rays; we are writing for medics again.
 * Cysts may be lined by osteoclasts and sometimes blood pigments, which lend to the notion of "brown tumors." - where have these "cysts" come from all of a sudden, this is the first time they are mentioned. What are they, where are they and they important?
 * Fine needle aspiration can be used to biopsy bone lesions, - "biopsy" is not a verb.
 * Actually it is used as a verb. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  19:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * delivered intravenously - writing for medics again, delivered intravenously, with medications - what medications?
 * is the recommended route of treatment - writing for medics.
 * the lesion healed and the autonomous material blended rapidly and seamlessly with the original bone. - does "autonomous material" mean "the transplanted bone?
 * The epidemiology section is about hyperparathyroidism and not OFC, as is the history section.

Oppose. Graham makes several good points. The image at the top right has bizarrely shaped arrows. Perhaps a standard shape of arrow could be used? The "References" need to be standardized. Please include volume and issue numbers if appropriate. It is preferable to use journal titles in full. The "Bibliography" section uses textbooks that only have a single page number referenced in the article. These books should use standard in-line citation. Axl ¤  [Talk]  19:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.