Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Psychology

Philippine Psychology
Reason: This article is well-written, it is self-sufficient, it features a new field of study which may further enhance the readers' curiosity, and most of all, it meets all the criteria of a Featured Article.
 * Oppose no references, no peer review, no images etc. Batmanand | Talk 09:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Object; no references, listy. --Spangineer[es] (háblame)  15:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Object:


 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.


 * The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.


 * Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like and  may be useful here.


 * Per WP:MOS, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading  ==Magellan's journey== , use  ==Journey== .


 * Per WP:MOS, the first letters of words in heading should not be capitalized unless: 1) it is a proper noun or 2) it is the first word of the heading.


 * Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.


 * Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
 * It lacks images, which though is not a prerequisite for FA status, it should still have if possible. Suggest peer review first. Thanks, AndyZ t 23:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Should be at Philippine psychology, as psychology is not a proper noun. Section headings should also use normal capitalization (first letter and proper nouns only). Tuf-Kat 04:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)