Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Planar graph/archive1

Planar graph
This article has extremely useful diagrams (as would be expected in an article about graph theory), and contains very useful, relevant, and succinct information about planar graphs. --Leapfrog314 04:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong object This article is very far from the FA status. It is a typical math article for mathematicians.  The lead does not give any reason for the layman to read this.  Theorems are provided without explaining why they are interesting or important.  No possible application is provided.  Many important concepts are defined in other articles and the reader needs all the time to click on the links.  The articles linked are themselves complicated and the reader needs basically to read all maths articles before beginning to understand what is told about in this.  Examples: complete graph, K3,3, etc... Vb 09:54, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose for reasons listed above. PedanticallySpeaking 17:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Object Inaccessible to non-mathematicians. It's unreasonable to assume the reader will be able to understand terms such as "4-partite". [[Image:Yemen flag large.png|24px]] CTOAGN (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2005 (UTC)