Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Portuguese phonology/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 15:06, 14 August 2007.

Portuguese phonology
This article has been completely rewritten and brought to GA status. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 16:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, refer to peer review. I can't find a record of it at WP:GA or any indication on the talk page of a GA candidacy.  It appears that a Project put GA tags on the Project templates without a GAN.  I suggest a peer review to help prepare the article for a GA nomination. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 16:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose --Kaypoh 12:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * Intro far too short
 * Overlisty in places and severe overuse of tables. Compare Irish phonology
 * Obviously fails exhaustivity.
 * Only 2 notes and 2 relevant sources. The IPA handbook is not a source about Portuguese phonology.
 * Circeus 14:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with these comments. Poorly written, too, especially for an article on language. First sentence ends with the prickly "difficulties in intelligibility". Tony 07:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.