Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Primal (video game)/archive1

Primal (video game)
I've nominated the article because I think it have a lot of information about characters and the locations where the game takes place. And it is well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable - which means, it meets the requirements of the Featured article criteria.Cheat2win 03:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Please read the criteria page fully. No references, no fair use rationales, fair use galleries... This is not even close. --- RockMFR 03:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose well written, nope - "The richly developed demon realms give the scenery the effect of being important"
 * comprehensive, nope - Where's the reception section? Where's the gameplay section?
 * factually accurate, nope - there are 0 references
 * neutral, nope - "action scenes with dramatic and well timed background."
 * stable, I'll give you this one
 * Also a trivia section, no fair use rationales, insufficient lead sized lead, insufficient sized history section, a section with five words etc etc. M3tal H3ad 08:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Added a references section. Cheat2win 01:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * comment. No fair use rationales are provided for any of the images. There are also large galleries of 'fair use' images that need to be removed or justified as to how they fit with wikipedia's fair use policy: "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible. ". —JeremyA (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, lacks a references section. PhoenixTwo 22:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Object: Severe fair use policy violations, both in terms of number of images and fair use rationale, contains a trivia section, contains a section for the sole purpose of stating the tagline, references are not formatted properly, does not contain enough out-of-universe information, most notably a Development or History section. Actually, looking at the references you added, almost the entire article was a copyright violation. Article is now a stub.  Pagra shtak  05:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. With the removal of the copy-vio material, the article is simply a stub. -- Pastordavid 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the WP:COPYVIO problems. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 20:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)