Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Push the Button (Sugababes song)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 05:25, 20 June 2012.

Push the Button (Sugababes song)

 * Nominator(s): Till 12:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because... I think it meets the Featured article criteria. Till 12:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * FN1: author name and name in title don't match
 * Done typo. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN2: album ID/catalogue number?
 * Done. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN4 and similar: should be dash not hyphen
 * ? 'Similar' please explain. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There are several footnotes which include this type of error. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, which ones? Till 13:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 30, 32, 36, 37, 47, 52, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 72, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 87, 88, 90 all use hyphens incorrectly. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN16: italicization
 * Done. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * What makes this a high-quality reliable source? This?
 * Why can't Glasswerk be considered a reliable source? And featured articles such as Hollaback Girl have used mvdbase. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * For Glasswerk, it doesn't appear to have an About page and Contact Us gives little information, so I'd like you to explain why it's reliable. As to mvdbase, "other stuff exists" is not a strong argument- what is the site's fact-checking or editorial policy? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * "Other stuff exists" might not be a strong argument but it's still confusing as to why it is used in some featured articles and not others. Glasswerk appears reliable to me but if I must remove it then I must, and won't pursue that challenge any further. Till 13:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * See here. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Shall I remove mvdbase as well then? Till 11:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN57: doubled quote marks
 * Done. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN59 returns 404 error, and title shouldn't be all-caps
 * Done. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN22: 404 error, part of URL seems to have bled into the title
 * Done fixed. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * FN65: italicization. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Till 06:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment is anybody else going to comment on this anytime soon? Till 04:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please remove the Release history section. It is almost completely redundant to the second sentence of Release.—indopug (talk) 16:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow are you serious? It is a rarity for an article about a song to not have a release table. Till 07:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. Even if used properly, an exhaustive list of release dates is trivia, i.e. information unworthy of an encyclopedia. Here, there's just one date, so the table has no merit at all.—indopug (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I removed it. Till 11:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Can somebody comment on this so we can have the review moving. I would like some constructive criticism. Thanks. Till 11:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.