Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ralph Nader/archive1

Ralph Nader
Already a good article, and already has had a peer review. Its a fantastic article. All that put together makes a Featured Article. 11kowrom 18:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Why do we think that Image:Dennis Kucinich and Ralph Nader.jpg is the work of a federal government employee? Jkelly 18:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment\Object -- The Image source is www.house.gov, which does make it public; however, this article still needs several citations, especially under the consumer advocacy section. Furthermore, while the coverage of his political ambitions is lengthy, I think that sections on his consumer advocacy and clashes with the automobile industry need to be more comphrehensive.--Thud495 19:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not everything at house.gov is in the PD. Everything that is created by a federal employee in the course of their duties is.  House members get webhosting from house.gov that they can publish their own photos in.  They don't become PD by being uploaded to house.gov.  Jkelly 21:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Object Not all citations are inline, tons of citation needed tags, not enough detail in some sections (mostly on early career), etc. Quotes should be in wikiquote. Mad Jack 20:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia's  False Prophet   holla at me   petition 02:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Object I diddn't have time to read the entire article, but I noticed a few things.
 * 1) Way to many red links, not sure if that is a valid point, but there is a giant list of almost all red links, not very useful
 * 2) History of his political career is lengthy, a triming would help.
 * 3) Very few pictures.  If no more can be found, then this can be ignored.
 * 4) as mentioned by Mad Jack, the quotes should be moved to wikiquote.


 * Object—2a. Here are examples from the lead that suggest that the whole text needs a good massage.
 * "Issues he has promoted include consumer rights, feminism, humanitarianism, environmentalism, and democratic government. Nader has also been a strong critic of"—Why not: "He has promoted consumer rights, feminism, humanitarianism, environmentalism and democratic government. Nader has been a strong critic of ..."—Go through it and weed out the "such as", "including", "etc", tags unless you really want to indicate that you're only giving us some of the items. Redundant "also"; remove it for better flow.
 * "the creation of many governmental and non-governmental organisations, such as the EPA, OSHA, Public Citizen, PIRGs and many more"—The "such as" says it all, doesn't it? Remove the over-informal "and many more". Again, there's an overuse of listing and subset tags—remove "many"?
 * "(1996, 2000, 2004)"—Make it "(1996, 2000 and 2004)".
 * "In 1996 and 2000 he was the nominee of the Green Party; Winona LaDuke was his vice-presidential running mate" These two ideas are so close that you might consider replacing the semicolon: "In 1996 and 2000 he was the nominee of the Green Party, and Winona LaDuke was his vice-presidential running mate."
 * People will hate the extent of your reliance on bulleted lists. See if you can recast some into running prose, and trim or eliminate others. This will sink the nomination otherwise. Tony 04:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, citations need to be cleaned up. Inline web links are mixed with ref tags. Stifle (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)