Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Slammiversary (2008)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by User:Ian Rose 10:05, 7 May 2014.

Slammiversary (2008)

 * Nominator(s): Will  C  00:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

This article is about an event held in June 2008. It is the sixth anniversary show of TNA's. A man died after the event while cleaning up the arena. I have two PPV articles from 2008 already achieve FA status and I'm trying to get all 12 there. This is my 4th attempt at getting a 2008 event to FA. I tried with Sacrifice 08 a couple of times but it never worked out. I'll be trying with it again after this one, but I figured I might as well try with a new one first. Any comments are appreciated.-- Will C  00:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll review another FA nomination in turn for a review on this article.-- Will C  09:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Small fixes
Why not just link right to the observer article? It also contains some things missed in the article. --124.178.179.118 (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Does "After the event..." in the lead deserve its own paragraph? Not sure why it is lumped together with the 'reception' stuff in the lead.
 * Not really about reception, covers all events after the event. The buyrate, things it is remembered for, the reception, and the death of someone. Someone dieing as a result of the event is pretty important but that line pretty much covers are necessary information.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Also in the lead (and in the article) "Six Woman Tag Team match" and in the article "Special Guest Ringside Enforcer", "Tag Team match" and "Ten Woman TNA Knockouts Makeover Battle Royal" -> remove capital letters?
 * They are match types and special titles. They are important and should be capital since that is how they are promoted. I would understand on tag team match, but it is like that to be uniform with all match titles. Plus it looks neater than 10 woman knockout makeover battle royal, special guest ringside enforcer, etc. These were things the events were promoted on. Nash being Special Guest Ringside Enforcer for this match was used later on in the storylines so it was more than just a random unimportant action.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The predominate storyline -> predominant?
 * Either works, they have nearly the same definition.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Reading the reception section, I thought you could afford to expand it a bit more. Mainly more of Keller's comments on the main event.
 * He didn't have alot to say. I'll look into it again.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I added another line regarding Keller, all I could do with him. Switched out the Sun stuff with Caldwell of the Torch.-- Will C  07:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Accident section - "TNA released a statement the next day on behalf of TNA President Dixie Carter." Is mentioning "on behalf of TNA President Dixie Carter" relevant? Also, I think that you would be better off using the quote like in NXT Arrival. "TNA released a statement the next day" -> quote -> "The June 12 episode"... starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 12:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * From the source. Said that was the purpose of the release, was on Carter's behalf and not the promotion. That table distracts too much from the purpose of the section. Makes itself the main point.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately for you and the article, due to the Sun's greedy "pay for reading or read only the first line" policy, that content is no longer verifiable. Click the source if you don't know what I'm talking about. What are you going to do about that? starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 01:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ahh crap, I guess I'll remove it. I left that over from the previous revision when it passed GA. I figured it was still good. I liked the sun additions, made the articles look more professional. I'll wait and see if I can find the release through someone else. I probably can.-- Will C  04:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Switched it with an article from the Fight Network.-- Will C  07:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You explain dark match... the second time it appears in the body, not the first. Should dark match even appear in the lead? starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 12:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Lead shouldn't have explanations, it distracts from the purpose of a summary. Dark match was on the card of the event. Promoted? Not really but still took place at the show.-- Will C  14:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The first time "dark match" appears in the body, not the lead, is in the Storylines section. You explained "dark match" later in the Event section. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 12:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed that. Removed dark match and switched it with pre-show in the disclaimer. Too much of an explanation for that area. Kept the explanation in the event with the first mention of the term, besides the lead of course.-- Will C  07:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Aftermath section - first paragraph first line - remove "still"? Also, first paragraph second line isn't sourced - the source is for the first line.
 * Done, I had the still in there because I mention the concerns in the Storylines section. I was trying to stay consistent.-- Will C  07:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Event section - Miscellaneous subsection - "Besides employees who appeared in a wrestling role" sounds totally weird to me. How about "Besides those who wrestled a match"?
 * You may be on to something here. However, I'm not sure that explains the whole purpose. I'm trying to include everyone. Even people involved in the matches through interference. There may be a middle ground to be found here though.-- Will C  07:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I know you're trying to include everyone, I'm not advocating taking out any names. I just think that the phrasing "Besides employees who appeared in a wrestling role" is wrong. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 08:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Done with a tweak.-- Will C  09:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Event section and Results section - Roode was the next to qualify after bashing a ladder Cage held with a chair and then pinning Cage. and Roode pinned Cage after hitting a ladder Cage held with a chair. - I think that after the "with a chair"s, you should insert "into Cage". It appears that Roode just bashed a ladder. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 07:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You are correct. He actually hit a ladder. He had no direct contact with Cage. In fact, I'm not even sure the ladder ran into Cage.-- Will C  07:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I hit up YouTube for highlights, Christian was pressing his face against the ladder like it was Trish Stratus. Roode pinned Cage after hitting a ladder Cage held with a chair into Cage. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 08:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Done with a tweak.-- Will C  09:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay lastly, the pictures need improvement. I don't like LAX or Styles' pictures. You could use a better Styles picture, maybe this one. Since there aren't any better LAX pictures, I recommend adding a Petey picture. I think one of this or this will work. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 11:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd change the AJ picture if a good one is presented that appears better than the one currently, but using a Williams picture is a no since his match didn't get any build leading up to and was mostly ignored. LAX overrules there since they were the undercard match and thus should be presented over Williams.-- Will C  17:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I also must consider licenses and the Styles picture above does exactly have the greatest copyright info and appears to not even be on commons, thus causing more problems.-- Will C  17:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Huh? The Styles pocture is on Commons. It was taken by Tabercil, an admin here (and on Commons) who has a history of taking pro wrestling photos.
 * What do you mean LAX "were the undercard match"? Petey was also in an undercard match, and his match was even longer than LAX's. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 07:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I was looking at the wrong Styles picture. My bad. Williams match was added to the card right before the event. Really had no build while the LAX match had nearly 2 months of build and thus was more important. I feel it should be presented since it was a main contest, over the X Title match. I changed the Styles picture though.-- Will C  17:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, all should be fine now; just saying I went to crop the LAX and Styles pictures. starship.paint  (talk &#124; ctrb) 13:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What?-- Will C  04:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. The following nominators are WikiCup participants: Wrestlinglover. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. UcuchaBot (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Closing comment -- I'm sorry but with no activity for over a month this review has stalled, so I'll be archiving it shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:43, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Ian Rose (talk) 07:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.