Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Stanley Cup


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 16:28, 18 November 2007.

Stanley Cup
previous FAC

Failed previous FAC, due to copyediting/style concerns. (Big thank yous to User:Awadewit for the copyedting and for User:SandyGeorgia for the MoS assesement). All have been addressed. I feel this exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. All comments/concerns will be addressed. Thanks,  Maxim (talk)  (contributions)  22:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Perspicacite 06:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Some comments. I've done a copyedit on the intro and first section. Minor issues:
 * Is there a better way to phrase "most coveted" in the intro sentence?
 * Is "official du jour redundant?
 * Citation #7 doesn't refer to the Generals anywhere. Sorry, made a mistake here -Wafulz 00:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [|Wiktionary defines it as "highly sought-after"; that can work, but personally I prefer coveted. I like the word. :-) I've fixed the redundant de jure/offical part. But nothing about the Generals is being reference by citation 7.  [[User talk:Maxim| Maxim ]]  01:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Support. There are some minor issues (overlinking comes to mind), but the article is written well enough.-Wafulz 19:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I think there should be something about the competition that this cup it awarded for. Also it's best to avoid see also sections if you can. Buc 09:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Since when is it best to avoid see also sections? They add useful links to the articles. Most featured articles have them--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 13:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not requirement for an article to be FA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 07:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes having the links are fine but see if you can incorporate them into the article. Buc 19:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel competition is covered throughly in the history section. Sorry for the tardiness. :'(  Maxim   02:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Support - Personally see no problems with it. Dihydrogen   Monoxide  04:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.