Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Stress (biology)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by Ucucha 11:07, 24 December 2011.

Stress (biology)

 * Nominator(s): Rebecca Silton (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because... Rebecca Silton (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you care to elaborate on why this might meet the featured article criteria? Jezhotwells (talk) 00:13, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Note: Nominator is not a significant editor of the article, and I see no evidence of discussion with the main editors. The nomination looks premature; consider rapid closure. Brianboulton (talk) 00:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Oppose I agree; article as it is now clearly fails Criteria 1c. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:33, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Strong Oppose: The nominator is NOT a major contributor to this article, nor have they consulted with major contributors. The nominator also appears to be unfamiliar with the criteria for FAC, as can be illustrated by the failure of multiple FA criteria in this article. Suggest immediate withdrawal. --MarcZimmer (talk) 02:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I think we have to be kind and assume good faith in this case. It looks like it was related to the Wikipedia Ambassador program looking at Rsilton early edits and the article history, where BrianMSweis is a student. I kindly recommend taking this article to Peer review first, and once you take care of the concerns there, place it on good article candidate to be further reviewed. Secret account 05:38, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.