Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Simpsons Game


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 21:51, 3 January 2009.

The Simpsons Game

 * Nominator(s): Gary King  ( talk ),  The Le ft  orium 

Before working on this article with User:Theleftorium, it looked like this. It has come a long way from that, and we now believe that it is ready for FA. Gary King ( talk ) 22:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments -
 * Please spell out lesser known abbreviations, such as BBFC, in the references.
 * Current ref 27 (Hopper, Steven..) is lacking a publisher.
 * Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * All done Gary King  ( talk ) 17:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Should this be here? "Users should not add a second nomination until the first has gained support..." etc etc. Scene7 was only nominated a couple of days ago & has no support yet. And FAC is pretty crowded at the moment. Would there be any harm if this waited a while? Brianboulton (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

(Later) Oh, I see it's a co-nom. I suppose that's within the rules? Brianboulton (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * We could switch the nominations, if that makes a difference? Gary King  ( talk ) 01:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If its within the rules, no problem as it is. Brianboulton (talk) 10:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment what decides which reviews are included in the reception box at the bottom of the page? Is there a reason why say scores of the Wii or PSP version from GameSpot and IGN aren't included when they are available? The first sentence of the Reception section reads "The game received generally positive reviews, receiving an aggregated score of 71% on Metacritic for the Xbox 360 version of the game." - the link provided describes a score of 71% as "mixed or average reviews", not "generally positive". Guest9999 (talk) 03:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have changed the overall reaction wording. Also, the Infobox now includes scores for every console—scores are only included in the Infobox if their references are also used somewhere else in the article. Gary King  ( talk ) 04:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, thanks for the information. Guest9999 (talk) 04:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Are all those release dates needed in the infobox? They make the infobox very long, and I can't imagine how the info could be useful to the general reader. As a counterexample, album/single infoboxes are recommended to only display the earliest date.
 * The fake-games links to their original ones (eg: Medal of Homer to Medal of Honor) are confusing. I thought for a minute there that Medal of Homer had its own article. Either delink them or mention clearly "(a parody of Medal of Honor) indopug (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you give me a recently promoted FA as an example that I can use for the infobox? For the moment, I want to keep the dates there as I'd rather have them in the article than not, and I'd rather have them in the infobox than in prose. I've unlinked those links. Gary King  ( talk ) 16:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't really work with video game articles so I don't know about that, but you can see this at Thriller (album) (which has been rereleased many many times). indopug (talk) 16:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The date given in that infobox is probably the first worldwide release date of the album. It's different from the release dates of this game. Plus, it wouldn't change much, anyways, since at least one release date should be given for each console. Gary King  ( talk ) 16:57, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Myst IV: Revelation uses a show/hide function for the multiple release dates. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Done Gary King  ( talk ) 23:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Support with two comments.
 * Do you think the image in "gameplay" should be a bit smaller? The text between the image and the bottom of the infobox seems a bit squished together.
 * I think the dates should be listed how they are. Otherwise they make the infobox too big.
 * Otherwise, great job. Tez kag 72 15:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I have moved the image; it wasn't even at the correct paragraph before, but it is now, and it also doesn't squish the text between the infobox anymore. As for the release dates, it was placed into a collapsed box after the discussion right above yours, and I think that it does indeed help to make the infobox smaller nicely. I don't quite understand what you mean, also, because you want the collapsed box removed but say that it would otherwise make the infobox long, but if I removed the collapsed box and didn't hide the release dates by default then the infobox would be longer initially. Gary King  ( talk ) 16:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I originally thought there shouldn't be a "show" function, but I changed my mind, went back, crossed it out, and put my other opinion, which is what I think now. I guess I'll just remove the crossed-out phrase. Tez kag 72 18:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment—Gary, the writing in the lead doesn't fill me with confidence.
 * Packing too much into the second sentence—and and and: "The game was developed, published, and distributed by Electronic Arts and released in North America in October 2007 and worldwide in November 2007." Try this: "The game was developed, published, and distributed by Electronic Arts; it was released in North America in October 2007 and worldwide in November 2007."
 * "As" is a bug-bear in English, especially for non-native readers. Does it mean "because" or "while"? "The game follows the five Simpson family members—Homer, Marge (with Maggie), Bart, and Lisa—as they learn that they are part of a video game and are given superpowers to resolve several situations." Try "...—who learn they are ...". You could lose the "that".
 * "The Simpson family travels to four scenarios in parodies of other games to collect key cards used to infiltrate their creator's mansion and ultimately save their predecessors from destruction." So they save their predecessors by travelling to those scenarios or not? If so, add "to" before "save". There's a lot of this type of meaning-altering ellipsis of "to" and "will" I'm seeing in FACs.

Maybe it improves later in the article. Tony  (talk)  07:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * "would not always"? Either "did" or "does" not. Tony   (talk)  07:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I believe User:Theleftorium has got them. Gary King  ( talk ) 15:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose on criterion 3 - We need to hash out the fair use images! Cage match!
 * File:The Simpsons Game XBOX 360 Cover.jpg - This fair use rationale needs to list who the copyright owner is.


 * File:The Simpsons Game - screenshot.png - I question the need for this fair use image. It is very hard to see the HUD elements in the image, which is the ostensible reason for its inclusion. You really have to peer at the screen to see them and they are very unclear even when you do manage to peer in.


 * File:Groening at comiccon.jpg - Is there a way to fix the flickr review tag? It says the licenses don't match, but they do. :)

Looking forward to quickly resolving these issues. Awadewit (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Done the first. The second is the best screenshot we've got. Other screenshots would show the HUD that small, too, but at least this one is bright and also shows both Bart and Lisa, two of the four main characters. Fixed the Groening. Gary King  ( talk ) 21:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * But the reason for the screenshot is to show the HUD elements (as is outlined on the fair use rationale). If those elements are really too small to be seen, there is no reason to have the image. I would suggest removing this image. Awadewit (talk) 13:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I've tweaked the rationale and the image caption. The screenshot also shows Lisa using her saxophone special power to stun enemies. She's playing her saxophone and the wavy lines coming from her indicates the stun power, which is affecting the wood logger enemies. Gary King  ( talk ) 15:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The article does not discuss the visual aspects of the saxophone's power, however. Remember, that there has to be critical commentary associated with the image. Right now, the article states that Lisa uses her saxophone to stun enemies. Can you add a bit more to the article that would justify having an image of that happening? Awadewit (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed the image. Gary King  ( talk ) 00:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * And I have struck the oppose. Awadewit (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Support with quick comment (haven't looked above at all). Any more recent estimates for sales total? Otherwise, I can't find anything seriously wrong about it. I'm a tad concerned the writing might not be the most encyclopediac (like in the plot section), but I realize that might be difficult given the content. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's the most recent we could find, but we'll keep looking. Gary King  ( talk ) 04:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Support with small comment. The External links section looks rather small compared to other Featured Video Game Articles. Are there any other sites which would be appropriate for that section? Paper Luigi (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I added links to GameTrailers and MobyGames. — The Le ft orium  23:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments from 
 * They praised its visuals and writing, which included many parodies of other video games, while they criticized its short length and poor camera system, which does not always function properly. - the lead is in a past tense, so the does should be a did
 * She can use it to flick, smash, freeze, or send lightning bolts to enemies as well as lift certain items. - comma before as well
 * The Simpsons Game, which parodies video games from 30 years ago to the present, was forced to have some of its content removed after several video game companies complained about it. Rizzer, however, was still pleased with the amount of parody in the game and considered The Simpsons the "perfect vehicle to poke fun at the games industry". At the 2007 Games Convention in Leipzig, Germany, a poster for "Grand Theft Scratchy", one of the levels in The Simpsons Game and a parody of Grand Theft Auto, was asked to be taken down by an employee of Rockstar Games, the company that develops the Grand Theft Auto series of video games.  - is this verified by ref #18? --Truco 15:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * All done. Yep, that's all verified by that ref. Gary King  ( talk ) 15:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow you're quick with these comments, Support promotion to FA after meeting WP:WIAFA.--Truco 15:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.