Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Those We Don't Speak Of/archive1

Those We Don't Speak Of
I worked a lot on this article, and with the major help of a few peer reviewers, I think the article turned out to be of outstanding quality. -- SoothingR 09:31, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Far too short and insignificant to be a featured article - this is not a comment on the subject of the article (doesn't matter here) but the general fact that the article is lacking everywhere. The use of colour in the text at one point is terribly tacky, the Manual of Style is not followed where the film name is mentioned, the reference quoted (ie. the film itself) is not enough including where you draw parallels to Harry Potter (borders very closely on original research), and the spoiler warning is in a weird place. Essentially, this is not Wikipedia's finest work and is far from it. Harro5 09:46, 9 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Oppose 1) the sections are too small, it should be increased. 2) Would like to see more references 3) Lead should be expanded 4) bulleted text converted to prose. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  09:53, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Too short, as others have said, and it simply has no material. This is not a question of bytes, but of content.  All it says is that this is a feature of a film and then proceed to give the plot!  To add substance would mean taking the article far away from its purported subject and into a discussion of psychological film, the mismarketing of this film (as a horror movie), the expectation of movie "secrets," etc.  None of that would be germane.  In other words, I don't believe this object can be overcome.  Geogre 02:42, 10 October 2005 (UTC)