Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tom and Jerry (MGM)

Tom and Jerry (MGM)
I have nominated this article because Tom and Jerry are deep rooted in cultrue around the globe, the article is well written and neutral, provides documentation, and is fun to read. Maclover134 13:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment It can be improved by reducing links to solitary years. A monobook tool allows this to be done with one click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. Hope that helps. bobblewik 17:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: try and split the LEAD into parapgraphs, make it look a bit more organised :) --Skully Collins 10:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong object There strikes me as being too much detail in the history section, but nothing about how critics have viewed the franchise over time. The part about Ted Turner is unnecessary or could be placed elsewhere. The writing (e.g., the part about Turner) is drab. "Plot" and "Characters" could be reorganized: you spend most of "Characters/Tom and Jerry" discussing plot resolutions. There are only two references and absolutely no inline citations. You should probably send this through Peer Review.--Monocrat 17:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Object. Starts witha list, no inlince citations... why so many people ignore the recommendation 'use peer review first'?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. No refs. Geet a peer review. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 03:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)