Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Who Framed Roger Rabbit/archive 1

Who Framed Roger Rabbit
Its a very thurough article. I can't think of what else could be said about this movie.--The_stuart 00:15, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Quotes belong at Wikiquote. Neutralitytalk 01:49, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Moved, all though I have never moved anything to Wikiquote and may have done it wrong.--The_stuart 02:43, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I haven't read through the article yet, but I'd like to see more photos. As it is, there is only one image, an advertising poster, in the lead section.  Are there images of the production (like photos of the actors interacting with the foam-rubber "character" props) or screencaps from the completed film (these qualify under fair use, right?) that could be added? slambo 14:30, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. 1) The criticism section needs references and attribution. Who consider it a modern classic? Who accuses it of "superfluous movement"? 2) "Trivia", "Errors" and "Cartoon characters that make cameo appearances" are list like sections, and not prose. They do not belong in a featured article in their current form, and are a sharp contrast with the other sections, which are well written. Rewrite/move/delete. 3) As slambo already pointed out, it would be nice to get some more pictures. At least a picture of Roger himself would b enice. 4) I like the section on previous films that combine animation and real action (even if it is not really about the movie itself); could it be expanded to also include later movies (possibly influenced)? Jeronimo 20:44, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. "a renaissance in the animation industry" is not only repeated, it's linked twice.  "Who Framed Roger Rabbit is considered a modern film classic" - who considers it that?  In fact, all of the criticism is unsubstantiated -- who holds these positions?  What are "Held cels"?  "Several Easter eggs were hidden into the film" - are you sure they're in the film and not in the DVD alone?  "The issue of whether or not the writers intended Angelo to be referring to the stage or cinematic version is questionable and worth noting" - why?  Clean up the red links, especially to Gary Wolf.  A section on the massive differences between the movie and the book, or else a separate article on the book, is very strongly needed.  RickK 07:13, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment made a few changes here and there. Added a accliam section, as I feel it's different then Significance, and added critics quotes as well.  Added movie infobox.  Added later films Roger Rabbit influenced, although maybe "films combining live action with animation" should be a seperate wikipedia article? --Poorpete 19:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)