Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wormhole/archive1

Wormhole

 * Nominator(s): Nat682 (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because it is well-written, very comprehensive, includes graphics and formulas as visual aids to help the reader understand the topic in addition to the text, it has an excellent lead section, and there are plenty of references to back up the text. Thus, I truly think it deserves featured article status. --Nat682 (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments From a first look the article seems to suffer from various technical problems. TR 08:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It contains a number of external links in the body of the text. Per wikipedia guidelines (WP:EXTLINK) this should not typically happen.
 * Many sections are completely unreferenced.
 * Some sections refer to references that are not properly referenced. For example, the definition section attributes the first definition as coming from "Matt Visser's Lorentzian wormholes", but does not give a proper reference to this work.
 * The article could do with some sort of history section, detailing the development of ideas on the subject.

You failed to add this nomination to the page at WP:FAC; since it appears the article is unprepared for FAC, I will remove the FAC template from the talk page. Please consider peer review. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 23:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)