Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Illegal prime/old

Illegal prime

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

Honestly, I can't figure out why it was ever featured -- it is a simple, brief article that is grammatically fine, with a few links and a couple of images (put there when we panicked about FAs with no images -- I can't say the images add much to the article). If this is FA quality, I can think of a few tens of thousands of articles around here that qualify also. We have excellent math and computer science contributors here whose work is astonishingly good -- let's not dishonor their work by leaving up such a mediocre article in that field, eh? Jwrosenzweig 20:36, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC) Note This article has already been de-featured. - Taxman 13:12, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree. Great article so far, but much more to say on the topic. I've rarely seen an FA so short. Derrick Coetzee 22:07, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Support removal. There's more material that should be in this article. This has been nominated for removal before: Featured_article_removal_candidates/archive. &mdash; Matt 22:31, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:21, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Hmm - the tag was removed on 2 Aug 2004 - see Talk:Illegal prime. -- ALoan (Talk) 00:00, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. Filiocht 10:23, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 20:53, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)