Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/L. Paul Bremer

L. Paul Bremer

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

this article is so short that it is more a stub than a featured article. how did it become a featured article at all??? just make a comparison with some other featured biography Avala 19:00, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep - David Gerard 19:11, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * please explain Avala 19:25, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * It's substantially bigger than a stub; is there more that could be said about this individual? &mdash; Matt 09:01, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The comment that this is a stub is extreme hyperbole. DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:40, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * of course it is not a stub but it doesn`t look like featured either[[User:Avala|Avala| &#9733; ]] 14:01, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Similar length to Horatio Nelson (which has an atrocious lead section). The "Trivia" section could be expanded upon, but I don't think that's enough to support delisting. Keep. Johnleemk | Talk 11:58, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * On second thought, SUPPORT REMOVAL. Hades itself may be under ice by the time his book comes out, Y.B. 8/20/2004
 * Support removal. It doesn't have good external links, crucial to evaluating the accuracy and NPOV of a bio, doesn't discuss third parties' vies of Bremer's tenure in any of his posts, is shorter on detail than the standard FA bio, and could use better subsectioning & layout.  On the other hand, seeing this article makes me feel bad about putting war elephants up for removal.  +sj +  20:27, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * It's still here. There should be more written about the Coalition Provisional Authority instead.  Y.B.  8/24/2004