Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Lollapalooza

Lollapalooza

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

Minus the large list of lineups by year and the lead section, it is barely a page. Very hard to believe it is complete. Also has no references. - Taxman 02:43, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 03:54, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove--Evil Monkey 04:08, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. Yet again a mediocre article mysteriously promoted by Maveric149. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 08:18, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * There's nothing myseterious about it. This was a holdover from the brilliant prose days. Mav did not 'promote' it - he simply happens to be the one who tagged it. &rarr;Raul654 09:05, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * What is mysterious is the reason why this article was seen as brilliant prose at all as I don't think it is, or was in March of this year. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 15:57, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * There is nothing "mysterious" about it, and your tone is less than cordial. All I did was put the featured tag on every article that was then a featured article. I DID NOT PROMOTE THOSE ARTICLES! Please do a little research before making statements like that in the future or else your words may backfire and just make you look rude and illinformed. --mav 02:17, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I think we had somewhat lower standards then. Now are standards are much higher, which means we're becoming a better encyclopedia. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 02:16, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. Not particularly well organized or written and largely just lists. Could use more references. Jacob1207 18:35, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Remove. &mdash; Matt Crypto 00:10, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)