Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Spam (electronic)

Spam (electronic)

 * Article is no longer a featured article

No references section or Notes section, no use of footnotes at all. Very choppy Table Of Contents and general layout. Lots of short sections/subsections. (particularly the 'Spamming in different media' subsections, all one short paragraph each). Could do with more photos (although this is not an FA requirement). Too many external links. This is not an example of Wikipedia's best work. — Wackymacs 11:49, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Remove per nom. Although there is one footnote&mdash;at the bottom of the "Overview" section! &mdash;Kirill Lokshin 17:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. This one is not so easily fixable. It has terribly short paragraphs, poor balance of coverage and no real references. - Taxman Talk 18:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. A lot of work has clearly gone into this, and it'd be a pity to see it de-listed.  I'll try to have  a go at it soon. Mark1 19:25, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove, per nom. &laquo; Lord ViD &raquo; 07:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Tentative remove—let's see what Mark can do. Start by fixing the pointillistic paragraphing? Tony 06:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)