Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Triangle

Triangle

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

I like the images in the article - they are of high quality. However, pictures alone would not get this article to FA status today. Firstly, there are far too many one sentence paragraphs. The lead section is too short. The history of the triangle is not explored (for instance, there is nothing about the Pythagoreans and their view of the triangle). There is a lot of maths, but not much of an explanation of why you would use the maths (for instance, see "Heron's formula"). Though not retroactive I know, there is no references section (which I feel for something like a triangle, there really should be). I'm afraid I think it should be delisted from FA. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:22, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Not a vote, but finding a reference for this shouldn't be hard. Mark1 06:06, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Support removal for reasons above. Johnleemk | Talk 12:18, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove - Taxman 20:44, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove Everyking 00:35, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I thought it was good! Brookie 10:59, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * oh, it's good all right. I liked it even. However, good and featured article quality are not the same thing. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:02, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)