Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Zuiderzee Works

Zuiderzee Works

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

The article fails to meet: 2(c) "factually accurate" includes the supporting of facts with specific evidence and external citations (see Verifiability); these include a "References" section where the references are set out, enhanced by the appropriate use of inline citations (see Wikipedia:Cite sources). No Reference section and no inline citations. The only candidate for a general reference source available in the article, from External links, is not in English. The article is detailed and the writing is OK, but there are numerous interpretations and conclusions beyond simple facts that should have some source, e.g. Though agriculture was initially again the main purpose of the polder, it had not yet been decided, the post-war period saw a shift in the design goals.--Tsavage 09:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC) (NOTE: I created this FARC at least a couple of months ago, then withdrew it and posted a request for references on the article's Talk instead. I agree with this being restored at this point under my sig (although I...hadn't gotten around to restoring it myself), as the article hasn't been improved... --Tsavage 00:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC))
 * Remove per delisted former nom above. refs were requested in april 2005. now, still not a single ref to be seen. not one. zero. Zzzzz 00:00, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove. No references at all, and I don't have the ability to fix it myself. - Taxman Talk 13:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove, zero references. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 02:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove. And slap and original research tag on it. I hope the editors of newly-rejected featured candidates don't get a gander at this one. Davodd 10:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)