Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/same-sex marriage

same-sex marriage

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

Heavily biased towards gay rights POV --Uncle Ed 18:43, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Huh? You're kidding, right? Please provide some evidence for this odd-ball claim. Tannin 19:24, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree that this should not be a featured article, but not because of a heavy bias in any direction. It is a good example of how an article can become bulky by trying to satisfy every side of a debate. The current controversy and constant stream of news articles surrounding this topic garantees that people will argue over every sentence. As long as this situation continues it will be hard to keep it unbiased (or at least get everyone to agree on what unbiased means; see the article's talk page), or complete. -- Kimiko 19:46, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * When did this become a featured article anyway? It wasn't when I started working on it.  At the same time, I don't see how it's biased, but --User:Ed Poor has made this claim on the talk page too, also without explaining it. Exploding Boy 01:33, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no actual reason to remove it Dmn 01:37, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)