Wikipedia:Featured article review/Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)/archive2

Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)

 * Article is no longer a featured article

Uh-oh, when a supposedly FA article has cleanup template we have a problem. Nominated a year ago, passed with [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)
 * a single support]]. No references, external links in body, no picture. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. The content itself seems ok (albeit somewhat essay-like), but there are severe structural problems. Phil s 09:32, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove I agree with Phils, there are major structural problems and why is the bibliography in the middle of the article? Ganymead 05:54, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. These are serious structural flaws, and must be fixed with the article going back through peer review and FAC before regaining its status. Harro5 07:11, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. Neutralitytalk 14:13, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove -- ALoan (Talk) 17:45, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove --Theo (Talk) 13:17, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove - didn't we start the essential references criteria when this became FA? Could be wrong. Whatever, it could be a lot better. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:34, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Remove. Get rid of it; it's not worthy. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:42, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)