Wikipedia:Featured article review/Auto rickshaw

auto rickshaw

 * Article is no longer a featured article.

It appears to be a well written article, but there is not a single reference on the page. References have come to be standard for featured articles. I would not have the time or energy to fix it, as, honestly, I am trying to work on Oregon articles and it would be extremely low on my priority list. If anyone wants to add references, then maybe it could stay. But with no references, I have to vote it off. PDXblazers 23:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Remove per nom. Unfortunate, as it seems comprehensive. bcasterline talk 23:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Remove due to lack of listed references; the small sections at the end could also use a bit of work. Christopher Parham (talk) 07:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove I added one reference (inline citation), which was once an external link. However, weak lead, one section which is blank except for a see, and weak writing. AndyZ 20:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

=Nichalp  «Talk»=  09:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove Nothing on the vehicle itself, and the history of the vehicle. The article needs a major copyedit and cleanup as it reads like an essay. References will be hard to come by. After considerable googling, I've managed to come up with some links that could be used to reference content.
 * http://www.ips.org/Critical/Enviroment/Environ/env1209008.htm
 * http://nariphaltan.virtualave.net/att42.htm
 * http://ccsindia.org/interns2003/chap26.pdf
 * http://www.roleximpex.com/bajaj-auto-rickshaw.html


 * Remove, no history and lacks of sources. --Ter e nce Ong 11:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)