Wikipedia:Featured article review/BC Rail/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Joelr31 22:55, 7 June 2009.

Review commentary

 * ''Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British Columbia, Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies, User talk:Slambo, User talk:Skookum1, User talk:JYolkowski

The article fails criteria 1c, since most of the article lacks in-line citations. Arsenikk (talk)  12:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, the citation is lacking for an article of its size. There is also an extremely large amount of broken wiki links for a featured article. The Locomotive section could be greatly enhanced by use of template box layouts, such as used for the locomotives on Virgin Trains. The citation and broken links problems are more critical however.81.111.115.63 (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

This article also fails criterion 3: See this dispatch for help on non-free images. Awadewit (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * File:PGE timetable.JPG - This non-free image needs a stronger fair use rationale or needs to be removed. Why do we need to see this particular cover? What does it show visually that cannot be explained with words?
 * File:Optimized image 44efede4.png - This non-free logo needs a stronger fair use rationale or needs to be removed. Why do we need to see this former logo?
 * File:Bcrailway.png - This non-free logo needs a stronger fair use rationale or needs to be removed. Why do we need to see this former logo?

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, image copyright. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! '') 01:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist Image and reference issues have not been addressed. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 17:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 06:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist, does not meet FA criteria. Arsenikk (talk)  18:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.