Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blue whale/archive1

Blue whale
There are many problems with this article: -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  03:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) It isn't factually accurate, contradicting itself and being tagged with contradict.
 * 2) It is not well referenced, with several places tagged with fact and only one in-line citation in the "Notes" section.
 * 3) Its "Physical description" section does not have a single image to illustrate it.
 * 4) Many objections brought up by multiple people on its talk page have not been addressed.

Nomination withdrawn. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  02:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)


 * May 2005 FAC
 * Dec 2005 Contradicting numbers introduced here and here
 * April 2006 Contradicting numbers discussed
 * No request for inline citations or illustrations


 * I cited a population estimate and removed the contradiction tag. I also converted an ext.link in the body into a footnote. --maclean 25 08:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Please see the guidelines that call for specifying the article's deficiencies on the talk page. I don't see any objections on the talk page that aren't resolved, but if you do, highlight them again. I'm removing this listing to give a chance for any issues to be handled on the article's talk page. - Taxman Talk 18:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)